Comparison Overview

603 Legal Aid

VS

Krause and Kinsman Law Firm

603 Legal Aid

93 N State St, Concord, 03301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

603 Legal Aid offers a single point of entry for people in New Hampshire who need legal assistance with civil (non-criminal) matters. We maintain an online library of resources about individuals’ rights in many types of civil cases, as well as a vibrant volunteer attorney training program and individualized services by staff advocates. The majority of our clients are families and people seeking to protect their housing, or survivors of domestic violence seeking safety from their abuser. We partner closely with NH Legal Assistance to ensure access to justice for all in our state.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Krause and Kinsman Law Firm

4717 Grand Ave, Kansas City, Missouri, 64112, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm, we represent those who have been physically injured, emotionally scarred or financially taken. Whether you have been in a car accident or are involved in a business dispute we can help. We generally represent our clients on a contingency fee basis. This means that you do not pay us unless we win your case. Websites: http://www.landlawyers.com/ http://krauseandkinsman.com/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krauseandkinsman.jpeg
Krause and Kinsman Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
603 Legal Aid
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Krause and Kinsman Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 603 Legal Aid in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Krause and Kinsman Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — 603 Legal Aid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

603 Legal Aid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Krause and Kinsman Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Krause and Kinsman Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/603-legal-aid.jpeg
603 Legal Aid
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krauseandkinsman.jpeg
Krause and Kinsman Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 603 Legal Aid company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 603 Legal Aid company.

In the current year, Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company and 603 Legal Aid company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company nor 603 Legal Aid company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company nor 603 Legal Aid company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company nor 603 Legal Aid company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 603 Legal Aid company nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 603 Legal Aid nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 603 Legal Aid company nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Krause and Kinsman Law Firm company employs more people globally than 603 Legal Aid company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither 603 Legal Aid nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 603 Legal Aid nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 603 Legal Aid nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 603 Legal Aid nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 603 Legal Aid nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 603 Legal Aid nor Krause and Kinsman Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X