Comparison Overview

52Launch

VS

Pando

52Launch

1602 Concord St, Framingham, Massachusetts, 01701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

52 Launch helps people with ideas get to market. How many times have we all said, "I had that idea"​ when we see an item on the shelf, TV or internet. There are over 7 billion people on this planet and each of us has an idea that could be revolutionary, disruptive, life-changing or just a better way to do something. There are three areas we help people with ideas... 1. We work for you, while you go to work! 2. We know exactly where to start and get your idea off the ground! 3. We have the resources and network to get an idea from napkin to market! There are many more reasons you'd consider us, but that's a good start!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pando

undefined, Park City, UT, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Pando exists to bring entrepreneurs who love the mountains together, empowering positive change for our local and global communities. Pando is a 501(c) 3 organization that connects, supports and empowers entrepreneurs, thought leaders, and change makers. We create lasting connections and opportunities for growth for our members, helping them achieve their business dreams. Through programming, education and knowledge-sharing, we seek to connect and support our members.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/52launch.jpeg
52Launch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pandolabs.jpeg
Pando
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
52Launch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pando
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 52Launch in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pando in 2025.

Incident History — 52Launch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

52Launch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pando (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pando cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/52launch.jpeg
52Launch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pandolabs.jpeg
Pando
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

52Launch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pando company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pando company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 52Launch company.

In the current year, Pando company and 52Launch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pando company nor 52Launch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pando company nor 52Launch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pando company nor 52Launch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 52Launch company nor Pando company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 52Launch nor Pando holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 52Launch company nor Pando company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

52Launch company employs more people globally than Pando company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither 52Launch nor Pando holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 52Launch nor Pando holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 52Launch nor Pando holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 52Launch nor Pando holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 52Launch nor Pando holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 52Launch nor Pando holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X