Comparison Overview

434 Marketing

VS

Adrexo

434 Marketing

707 Clay St, Lynchburg, Virginia, 24504, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://www.434marketing.com

Excellent

434 Marketing is a veteran digital marketing agency that specializes in website design, content marketing, and market research. We help businesses of all sizes grow their online presence and achieve their marketing goals with a thorough approach to your website’s design, structure and content.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Adrexo

1330 avenue de la Lauzière Aix en Provence, 13100, FR
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Good

Between 700 and 800
http://www.adrexo.fr

Premier opérateur privé français de diffusion d’Imprimés Publicitaires, ADREXO est la filiale de HOPPS GROUP depuis le 3 janvier 2017. ADREXO diffuse chaque année plus de 9 milliards d’Imprimés Publicitaires grâce à un réseau de distribution couvrant 24,4 millions de boîtes à lettres qualifiées sur la France. Ce media aux caractéristiques uniques est lu chaque semaine par 70% des Français et choisi par plus de 25 000 annonceurs. En complément, ADREXO propose à ses clients des solutions de marketing digital local et d’opérations événementielles. ADREXO édite le site web et l’application mobile Promodeclic. La société compte 20 500 collaborateurs et a généré 278,4 millions d’euros de chiffre d’affaires en 2015.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/434marketing.jpeg
434 Marketing
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adrexo.jpeg
Adrexo
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
434 Marketing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Adrexo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 434 Marketing in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adrexo in 2025.

Incident History — 434 Marketing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

434 Marketing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Adrexo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adrexo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/434marketing.jpeg
434 Marketing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adrexo.jpeg
Adrexo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

434 Marketing company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Adrexo company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Adrexo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 434 Marketing company.

In the current year, Adrexo company and 434 Marketing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Adrexo company nor 434 Marketing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Adrexo company nor 434 Marketing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Adrexo company nor 434 Marketing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 434 Marketing company nor Adrexo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Adrexo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to 434 Marketing company.

434 Marketing company employs more people globally than Adrexo company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. The affected element is the function elf_swap_shdr in the library bfd/elfcode.h of the component Linker. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 9ca499644a21ceb3f946d1c179c38a83be084490. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Impacted is the function _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component Linker. Executing manipulation can lead to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called ea1a0737c7692737a644af0486b71e4a392cbca8. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in GNU Binutils 2.45. This issue affects the function dump_dwarf_section of the file binutils/objdump.c. Performing manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named f87a66db645caf8cc0e6fc87b0c28c78a38af59b. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.7
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in zhuimengshaonian wisdom-education up to 1.0.4. This vulnerability affects the function selectStudentExamInfoList of the file src/main/java/com/education/api/controller/student/ExamInfoController.java. Such manipulation of the argument subjectId leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References