Comparison Overview

4 New Square Chambers

VS

AFG LAW

4 New Square Chambers

4 New Square, London, WC2A 3RJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

4 New Square Chambers is a leading barristers’ chambers specialising in commercial litigation and arbitration. Our members act and advise in disputes in the UK and internationally, and have a well-earned reputation for the strength of their advocacy and client focus. We are regularly instructed in some of the largest disputes handled in courts and tribunals worldwide, including many of the landmark legal cases of the 20th and 21st centuries. We are known not only for our legal credentials but also our commerciality, excellent client service and collegiate working practices. We are committed to furthering equality and diversity and maintaining a friendly working environment which nurtures member and staff wellbeing.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 143
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AFG LAW

Folds Road, Bolton, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are a full service high street law firm with offices in Bolton, Bury and Stockport. Our work covers family law, residential property law, commercial property law, dispute resolution, and private client. Our expert teams cover areas such as children matters, care proceedings, elderly client services and wills & probate. We are contracted with the Legal Aid Agency in addition to providing private client work.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4-new-square.jpeg
4 New Square Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afg-law.jpeg
AFG LAW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
4 New Square Chambers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AFG LAW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 4 New Square Chambers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFG LAW in 2025.

Incident History — 4 New Square Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

4 New Square Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AFG LAW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFG LAW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4-new-square.jpeg
4 New Square Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afg-law.jpeg
AFG LAW
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both 4 New Square Chambers company and AFG LAW company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, AFG LAW company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 4 New Square Chambers company.

In the current year, AFG LAW company and 4 New Square Chambers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AFG LAW company nor 4 New Square Chambers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AFG LAW company nor 4 New Square Chambers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AFG LAW company nor 4 New Square Chambers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers company nor AFG LAW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers nor AFG LAW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers company nor AFG LAW company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

4 New Square Chambers company employs more people globally than AFG LAW company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers nor AFG LAW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers nor AFG LAW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers nor AFG LAW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers nor AFG LAW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers nor AFG LAW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 4 New Square Chambers nor AFG LAW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X