Comparison Overview

4-5 Gray's Inn Square

VS

In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank

4-5 Gray's Inn Square

4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

4-5 Gray’s Inn Square is a leading public and commercial law chambers. Our core areas of law are: public, commercial, planning, property & housing, local government,, international, regulatory & disciplinary and sports. We are committed to the provision of creative and practical legal advice responsive to the commercial needs of our clients. We have a reputation for excellence in all of our practice areas. Our barristers are supported by a first-class clerking and business management team

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank

26 Broadway, 8th Floor, None, New York, NY, US, 10004
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

In The House is an independent think tank that is committed to helping in-house legal departments improve their operations and helping individual in-house legal professionals have long, successful and satisfying careers. Among other activities, we have conducted ground-breaking, first-of-their kind surveys about such essential, but under-explored, topics as the role of in-house counsel in addressing cybersecurity, executive misconduct, controlling legal spending and managing litigation risk. We work with cutting-edge sponsors, including innovative Legal Tech firms and entrepreneurial law firms. Learn more at www.InTheHouse.org

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4-5-gray's-inn-square-chambers.jpeg
4-5 Gray's Inn Square
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
4-5 Gray's Inn Square
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 4-5 Gray's Inn Square in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank in 2025.

Incident History — 4-5 Gray's Inn Square (X = Date, Y = Severity)

4-5 Gray's Inn Square cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4-5-gray's-inn-square-chambers.jpeg
4-5 Gray's Inn Square
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/in-the-house-llc.jpeg
In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

4-5 Gray's Inn Square company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 4-5 Gray's Inn Square company.

In the current year, In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company and 4-5 Gray's Inn Square company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company nor 4-5 Gray's Inn Square company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company nor 4-5 Gray's Inn Square company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company nor 4-5 Gray's Inn Square company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square company nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

4-5 Gray's Inn Square company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company.

4-5 Gray's Inn Square company employs more people globally than In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 4-5 Gray's Inn Square nor In The House® — The In-House Legal Think Tank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X