Comparison Overview

3TC Design

VS

opixido

3TC Design

411 Garrard Street, Covington, 41011, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Each client and each individual project is unique – with different objectives, different challenges, different timing– but our approach is flexible. We take care to deliver a perfect partnership of innovation and strategy resulting in a difference at market. What sets us apart is our exceptional care to service, our nimbleness from start to finish and our desire to always go above and beyond. We Can Help 3TC will assist you with all design needs while helping your brand succeed in an ever-changing and visually challenging marketplace. Our background and skills include: - Research & Insights - In-Store Activation - Strategy & Positioning - Naming & Brainstorming - Brand Identity - Ideation & Visualization - Packaging Design - New Product/Structure - In-Store Merchandise - Conceptual Design - Collateral Design - And More! Let’s achieve great things together. We are up for any challenge!

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

opixido

42, Rue Alexandre Dumas, Paris, 75011, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

Opixido, c’est avant tout une équipe de créatifs, curieux du contenu et passionnés partageant la même envie de vous offrir une communication sensible, audacieuse et pertinente. Vingt-deux ans après sa création, Opixido fait partie des acteurs majeurs en matière de création multimédia et de communication à vocation culturelle. Nous sommes fiers de travailler avec de nombreux établissements muséaux, institutionnels et culturels, implantés sur tout le territoire. Nous concevons et réalisons des supports de communication attractifs, forts, en adéquation avec cette volonté de démocratisation des connaissances.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/3tc-design.jpeg
3TC Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opixido.jpeg
opixido
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
3TC Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
opixido
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 3TC Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for opixido in 2025.

Incident History — 3TC Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

3TC Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — opixido (X = Date, Y = Severity)

opixido cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/3tc-design.jpeg
3TC Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opixido.jpeg
opixido
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both 3TC Design company and opixido company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, opixido company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 3TC Design company.

In the current year, opixido company and 3TC Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither opixido company nor 3TC Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither opixido company nor 3TC Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither opixido company nor 3TC Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 3TC Design company nor opixido company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 3TC Design nor opixido holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 3TC Design company nor opixido company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

opixido company employs more people globally than 3TC Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither 3TC Design nor opixido holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 3TC Design nor opixido holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 3TC Design nor opixido holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 3TC Design nor opixido holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 3TC Design nor opixido holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 3TC Design nor opixido holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X