Comparison Overview

3D Lettering Corp.

VS

James Yeates Print & Communications

3D Lettering Corp.

4477 Shopping Lane, Simi Valley, CA, 93063, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.3DGPX.com

We are 3D Lettering - a global branding solutions company providing design, production and installation services to the automotive, Electronics and leisure Industries. With almost 22 years’ experience and a client portfolio of global blue-chip motor manufacturers, Marine and engineering conglomerates in over 25 different countries worldwide, we are the perfect branding partner for your business. A family, a team of young and motivated to produce adhesive technologies, labels, emblems and coats of metallic or resin. For many "stuff out of this world"​, for us to 3D Lettering daily work that continues to please us, to get passionate, pushing us to improve. Always on the cutting edge, New Process utilizes the latest technology to provide the finest screen and digital printing on virtually any substrate, and precision die-cut to any shape. Plus, because we are a full-service company and do all of our work in-house, we can provide significant price and time advantages to our customers that other companies cannot.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

James Yeates Print & Communications

65 Macleod St, Bairnsdale, Victoria, AU, 3875
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://jamesyeates.com.au

James Yeates is a full-service media group providing print and digital solutions to businesses and individuals ranging from local to nationwide. We fully own and operate multiple regional newspapers and publications while servicing a range of quality products and services including graphic design, commercial printing, photo printing, and web design.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/3d-lettering-corp..jpeg
3D Lettering Corp.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-yeates.jpeg
James Yeates Print & Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
3D Lettering Corp.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
James Yeates Print & Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 3D Lettering Corp. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for James Yeates Print & Communications in 2025.

Incident History — 3D Lettering Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

3D Lettering Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — James Yeates Print & Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

James Yeates Print & Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/3d-lettering-corp..jpeg
3D Lettering Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-yeates.jpeg
James Yeates Print & Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

James Yeates Print & Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 3D Lettering Corp. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, James Yeates Print & Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 3D Lettering Corp. company.

In the current year, James Yeates Print & Communications company and 3D Lettering Corp. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither James Yeates Print & Communications company nor 3D Lettering Corp. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither James Yeates Print & Communications company nor 3D Lettering Corp. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither James Yeates Print & Communications company nor 3D Lettering Corp. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. company nor James Yeates Print & Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. nor James Yeates Print & Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. company nor James Yeates Print & Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

James Yeates Print & Communications company employs more people globally than 3D Lettering Corp. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. nor James Yeates Print & Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. nor James Yeates Print & Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. nor James Yeates Print & Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. nor James Yeates Print & Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. nor James Yeates Print & Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 3D Lettering Corp. nor James Yeates Print & Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References