Comparison Overview

360 Legal, Inc.

VS

SAS Daniels LLP

360 Legal, Inc.

201 Fletcher Ave, None, Sarasota, Florida, US, 34237
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At 360 Legal, our goal is to become a trusted partner for our clients. We understand that the that the legal services we provide represent your firm and often we are the initial contact that your firm has with a defendant. Therefore, we strive to provide a comprehensive legal suite of services that are focused on delivering unmatched efficiency, accuracy, and quality while meeting all legal and regulatory provisions. Our experienced and reliable staff offers unmatched services utilizing innovative technologies that keep you up to date on your case load in real-time. Additionally, since service of process doesn’t only happen during normal business hours, clients are able to access our case management system 24 hours a day to view real-time status of any service we provide. This includes the ability to initiate service requests and retrieve relative case documents. - Experience - Reliability - Comprehensive Service Offering - Industry Leading Technology

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SAS Daniels LLP

SAS Daniels LLP, Stockport, Cheshire, SK3 8AD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Understanding your needs. Protecting your interests. At SAS Daniels our team of friendly legal experts is here to support, provide advice and work side-by-side to find you the best solutions. Whether for yourself, your family, or your business, we will get to know your individual needs and tailor legal advice to suit. From wills and wealth planning to corporate and commercial law, our team is here to guide you through the process, using years of industry and local knowledge. We’ll protect your interests, making sure you get advice you can trust so you can achieve the best outcome possible. A Cheshire-based law firm, we have offices in Stockport, Chester, Macclesfield and Congleton. Visit our website to find out how we can help.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/360legal.jpeg
360 Legal, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sas-daniels-llp.jpeg
SAS Daniels LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
360 Legal, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SAS Daniels LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 360 Legal, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAS Daniels LLP in 2025.

Incident History — 360 Legal, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

360 Legal, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SAS Daniels LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAS Daniels LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/360legal.jpeg
360 Legal, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sas-daniels-llp.jpeg
SAS Daniels LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SAS Daniels LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 360 Legal, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SAS Daniels LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 360 Legal, Inc. company.

In the current year, SAS Daniels LLP company and 360 Legal, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP company nor 360 Legal, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP company nor 360 Legal, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP company nor 360 Legal, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. company nor SAS Daniels LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. nor SAS Daniels LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. company nor SAS Daniels LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SAS Daniels LLP company employs more people globally than 360 Legal, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. nor SAS Daniels LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. nor SAS Daniels LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. nor SAS Daniels LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. nor SAS Daniels LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. nor SAS Daniels LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 360 Legal, Inc. nor SAS Daniels LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X