Comparison Overview

360 Advocacy

VS

Processo Veritas LLP

360 Advocacy

1103 Parkview Blvd, Colorado Springs, 80905, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

360 Advocacy offers conferences as forums for the personal injury plaintiff bar to collaborate and respond to the challenges they face in today’s litigation environment. In a confidential setting with the most respected and experienced attorneys and experts as faculty members, each program is carefully crafted to maximize interactive and shared learning during the conference, and afterward through formal and informal networking. We realize that the information, collaboration and experience of the conferences we offer must extend beyond the on-site conference setting. We have begun this transition with our new website, incorporating a Resources center that brings together a group of highly recommended and vetted companies that offer products and services at insider pricing. In addition to their outstanding offers, these companies offer reference materials in the form of white papers and webinars (at no charge) that will help you in your goal to win more for your clients. And the Conferences and the Resources are just beginning. We will continue to expand our offerings with the goal to help you Be a Better Trial Lawyer.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Processo Veritas LLP

B25/1, Okhla Phase - II, New Delhi, New Delhi, 110020, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-30

Processo Veritas has vision and goal to develop various processes with innovation, technology, integrity, client trust and passion for excellence to delight our customer. We celebrate collective success Processo Veritas helps your company or law firm improve efficiency, minimize business and legal risks, stay ahead of the competition and reduce legal costs. You receive world-class LPO services from our experienced attorneys, engineers, and professionals in a structured process that delivers quality work, peace of mind and continous cost savings

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/360-advocacy.jpeg
360 Advocacy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processo-veritas-llp.jpeg
Processo Veritas LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
360 Advocacy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Processo Veritas LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 360 Advocacy in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Processo Veritas LLP in 2025.

Incident History — 360 Advocacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

360 Advocacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Processo Veritas LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Processo Veritas LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/360-advocacy.jpeg
360 Advocacy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processo-veritas-llp.jpeg
Processo Veritas LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both 360 Advocacy company and Processo Veritas LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Processo Veritas LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 360 Advocacy company.

In the current year, Processo Veritas LLP company and 360 Advocacy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Processo Veritas LLP company nor 360 Advocacy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Processo Veritas LLP company nor 360 Advocacy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Processo Veritas LLP company nor 360 Advocacy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 360 Advocacy company nor Processo Veritas LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 360 Advocacy nor Processo Veritas LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 360 Advocacy company nor Processo Veritas LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither 360 Advocacy nor Processo Veritas LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 360 Advocacy nor Processo Veritas LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 360 Advocacy nor Processo Veritas LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 360 Advocacy nor Processo Veritas LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 360 Advocacy nor Processo Veritas LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 360 Advocacy nor Processo Veritas LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X