Comparison Overview

The 36 Group

VS

Alderson Court Reporting

The 36 Group

4 Field Court, London, WC1R 5, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The 36 Group is ranked as a "Leading Set" of barristers' chambers in Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners, the leading lawyers' directories in the United Kingdom. The 36 Group is a multi-specialist set of barristers' Chambers located in the prestigious building at 4 Field Court, Gray’s Inn, which is generally considered to be one of the most impressive stand-alone buildings in any of the four Inns of Court. With over 170 barristers, mediators and arbitrators (including 14 King’s Counsel (KCs/Silks), 3 Senior Counsel (SCs/Silks) from Ireland and South Africa, and a Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India), The 36 Group is one of the largest London based sets. It is the preferred choice for many firms of solicitors, foreign law firms, public bodies, businesses, and individual members of the public. Within The 36 Group, dedicated practice groups provide specialist legal services that include advice, the drafting of agreements and other documents, and courtroom, tribunal, and arbitral advocacy. The 36 Group's barristers specialise principally in the following areas of law: crime, employment, family, immigration, property, private client and contentious probate, and shipping and international trade. Each of the main practice groups are readily recognisable by the prefix "36" followed by the relevant subject area of law, as in "36 Crime", “36 Family”, "36 Public & Human Rights”, and “36 Stone”. The Group's barristers are reputed to combine legal expertise and trial advocacy skills to an impressive level, whilst remaining sensitive to the needs of the client, irrespective of whether the client happens to be an individual, a partnership or a corporate entity, a public body or the Government of a foreign State. Some members also act as mediators and/or as arbitrators. William Tyler KC and Christopher Donnellan KC lead the 36 Group as Joint Heads of Chambers and co-Chairs of its Executive Board.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alderson Court Reporting

1111 14th Street, NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

From eDiscovery, Managed Review and Court Reporting (including Concise® Deposition Digesting, video synchronization, and digital video services) to Legal Staffing and Translations, Alderson, the first name in court reporting, now delivers total support for the entire litigation lifecycle. Enjoy 24/7 customer service backed by stringent recruiting standards and the support of the nation's largest privately-held litigation support provider. This is the Power of One.™ Headquartered in Washington, D.C., with offices around the country, Alderson has proudly been serving leading AmLaw firms and corporate counsel, U.S. presidents, and international agencies since 1938. From transcripts for key U.S. Senate committees to our work on the September 11 Victim’s Compensation Fund hearings, Alderson has continually set the standard in court reporting and litigation support solutions. Put the Power of One to work for you by leveraging our leading-edge litigation support solutions. Contact us today for a free consultation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/36-bedford-row.jpeg
The 36 Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alderson-court-reporting.jpeg
Alderson Court Reporting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The 36 Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alderson Court Reporting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The 36 Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alderson Court Reporting in 2025.

Incident History — The 36 Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The 36 Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alderson Court Reporting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alderson Court Reporting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/36-bedford-row.jpeg
The 36 Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alderson-court-reporting.jpeg
Alderson Court Reporting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The 36 Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alderson Court Reporting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alderson Court Reporting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The 36 Group company.

In the current year, Alderson Court Reporting company and The 36 Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting company nor The 36 Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting company nor The 36 Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting company nor The 36 Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The 36 Group company nor Alderson Court Reporting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The 36 Group nor Alderson Court Reporting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The 36 Group company nor Alderson Court Reporting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The 36 Group company employs more people globally than Alderson Court Reporting company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The 36 Group nor Alderson Court Reporting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The 36 Group nor Alderson Court Reporting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The 36 Group nor Alderson Court Reporting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The 36 Group nor Alderson Court Reporting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The 36 Group nor Alderson Court Reporting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The 36 Group nor Alderson Court Reporting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X