Comparison Overview

2nd Defense Inc.

VS

SportsTeam.com

2nd Defense Inc.

undefined, undefined, undefined, L3R 3T4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Founded in Markham, Ontario Canada by former NCAA hockey teammates Jeff Calabretta, Mico Galluzzo and Tom Bellis, 2nd Defense (2D) is a performance and protective apparel and equipment supplier focused on protecting today’s athlete with sustainable and technically advanced products without compromising performance. 2D focuses on performance, protection and sustainability. We do this by offering a complete product line of performance apparel manufactured from eco-friendly materials combined with the latest advancements in fabric technology. To our customers, the 2nd Defense (2D) brand name means quality, consistency and performance.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SportsTeam.com

27 Hollenberg Ct., Bridgeton, MO, 63044, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

We are sports enthusiasts and coaches just like you! We are a leading supplier of athletic uniforms, equipment, and apparel to youth organizations, sports teams, schools, universities, and municipalities throughout the world. So if you are a cheer coach in Switzerland, or a football coach in Oklahoma, we have you covered. The best part of our day is working with all the coaches who dedicate so much of their time to the development of their players. Our daily dedication is to make your team's uniform and equipment purchase a smooth and easy process so you can focus on what is most important. COACHING! We are committed to providing you with an exceptional experience each and every time. Our goal is simple: Build ongoing relationships with our customers...one customer at a time.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/2nd-defense-inc..jpeg
2nd Defense Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sportsteam-com.jpeg
SportsTeam.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
2nd Defense Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SportsTeam.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 2nd Defense Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SportsTeam.com in 2025.

Incident History — 2nd Defense Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

2nd Defense Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SportsTeam.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SportsTeam.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/2nd-defense-inc..jpeg
2nd Defense Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sportsteam-com.jpeg
SportsTeam.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SportsTeam.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 2nd Defense Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SportsTeam.com company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 2nd Defense Inc. company.

In the current year, SportsTeam.com company and 2nd Defense Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SportsTeam.com company nor 2nd Defense Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SportsTeam.com company nor 2nd Defense Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SportsTeam.com company nor 2nd Defense Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. company nor SportsTeam.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. nor SportsTeam.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. company nor SportsTeam.com company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

2nd Defense Inc. company employs more people globally than SportsTeam.com company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. nor SportsTeam.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. nor SportsTeam.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. nor SportsTeam.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. nor SportsTeam.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. nor SportsTeam.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 2nd Defense Inc. nor SportsTeam.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H