Comparison Overview

2b Management

VS

Print File, Inc.

2b Management

110 Greene St, Suite 501, New York, New York, US, 10012
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.2bmanagement.com

2b management is a boutique photography agency with offices in New York and Paris that provides management, representation, and development to a small curated group of artists: Anton Corbijn, Ellen Von Unwerth, Eric Guillemain, Luigi & Iango, Miles Aldridge, Tom Munro, Stephen Kidd. 2b also offers a full production services for print and film. founded in 2010 by Sandrine Bizzaro & René Bosne 2b works on numerous projects / year including editorial & advertising and also promotion of books and exhibitions. 2b Advertising clients include Chanel, Dior, Lancome, Guerlain, YSL, L’OREAL, Omega, Armani, Louis Vuitton, Burberry, Versace, Shiseido, Tom Ford, Moschino, Puma, Elizabeth Arden, Breitling, Tag Heuer, Max Factor, MAC, Jean Paul Gaultier, Bulgari, Ferragamo, Guess, Thierry Mugler, DVF, Azzaadine Alaia, Levis, Nike, Estee Lauder, D&G, Michael Kors, Hugo Boss, Calvin Klein, Givenchy, Blumarine, Alberta Ferretti, Oscar Della Renta, Tiffany, David Yurman, Coca Cola, etc 2b Editorial clients include US Vogue, British Vogue, Vogue Japan, Italian Vogue, L'Uomo Vogue, Vogue Hong Kong, Vogue Brazil, Vogue Spain, Vogue Arabia, Vogue Russe, Vogue Ukraine, German Vogue, Australian Vogue, Vogue Korea, Allure, V Magazine, W Magazine, Vanity Fair, New Yorker, T magazine, Times, New York Times, WSJ, Chaos, Self Service, Interview, Harper's Bazaar, Elle magazine, Numero… etc

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Print File, Inc.

US, 32703
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.printfile.com

For over 40 years, Print File has been the world's leading manufacturer of high quality archival storage and presentation products for negatives, slides, transparencies, photographs, memorabilia and CDs/DVDs. . When you purchase our products, you will see and feel the quality that has earned Print File the distinction as the clear choice of amateur and professional photographers, high schools, colleges, universities, museums and other fine institutions around the world.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/2b-management.jpeg
2b Management
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-file-inc..jpeg
Print File, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
2b Management
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Print File, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 2b Management in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print File, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — 2b Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

2b Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Print File, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print File, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/2b-management.jpeg
2b Management
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-file-inc..jpeg
Print File, Inc.
Incidents

FAQ

Print File, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 2b Management company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Print File, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 2b Management company.

In the current year, Print File, Inc. company and 2b Management company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Print File, Inc. company nor 2b Management company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Print File, Inc. company nor 2b Management company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Print File, Inc. company nor 2b Management company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 2b Management company nor Print File, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 2b Management nor Print File, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 2b Management company nor Print File, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

2b Management company employs more people globally than Print File, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither 2b Management nor Print File, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 2b Management nor Print File, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 2b Management nor Print File, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 2b Management nor Print File, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 2b Management nor Print File, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 2b Management nor Print File, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References