Comparison Overview

24win

VS

LudusCristaltec

24win

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

24win es una empresa que pone a disposición del ciudadano juegos y apuestas deportivas online como una forma de entretenimiento y ocio. Trabajamos diariamente para que estas apuestas y juegos sean excelentes, fiables y transparentes. Es por esto que nos encargamos de que las apuestas y juegos se desarrollen en un ámbito moderado y responsable. VISIÓN: Queremos ser la empresa líder de juego y apuestas deportivas en Latino América bajo una gestión profesional, eficiente y de calidad. Los valores que rigen nuestra empresa son los siguientes: - Excelencia en el servicio - Transparencia con el cliente - Desarrollar y mantener el talento en nuestra empresa - Compromiso con nuestros clientes - Respeto hacia la diversidad de culturas y tradiciones

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LudusCristaltec

Rua Eng Ferreira Dias 924, Porto, 4100-246, PT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

LudusCristaltec, from the Cristaltec Italian group, is focused in developing innovative games and technology for the Casino and Gaming industry. Our mission is to create amazing and unique products customized for each market segment. We have released more than 200 game titles and currently have over 100.000 boards on the market, across several countries. We offer a complete solution to our clients tailored to their specific needs. By designing every part of our products: hardware, system, games and technology we achieve great control and flexibility over all the key components. What about our team? We truly believe that a company is only as extraordinary as its People and we are fortunate to have great minds and talents that are passionate about what they do.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/24win.jpeg
24win
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luduscristaltec.jpeg
LudusCristaltec
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
24win
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LudusCristaltec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 24win in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LudusCristaltec in 2025.

Incident History — 24win (X = Date, Y = Severity)

24win cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LudusCristaltec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LudusCristaltec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/24win.jpeg
24win
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luduscristaltec.jpeg
LudusCristaltec
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

24win company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LudusCristaltec company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LudusCristaltec company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 24win company.

In the current year, LudusCristaltec company and 24win company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LudusCristaltec company nor 24win company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LudusCristaltec company nor 24win company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LudusCristaltec company nor 24win company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 24win company nor LudusCristaltec company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 24win nor LudusCristaltec holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 24win company nor LudusCristaltec company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither 24win nor LudusCristaltec holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 24win nor LudusCristaltec holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 24win nor LudusCristaltec holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 24win nor LudusCristaltec holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 24win nor LudusCristaltec holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 24win nor LudusCristaltec holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H