Comparison Overview

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica

VS

Eurofootball

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica

1450 Jackpot Blvd, Robinsonville, 38664, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Your Closest Bet for Fun! 1st Jackpot Casino features the newest slots with hundreds of new ways to win with the most popular games. We also feature all of your favorite table games and a Tunica exclusive with Wild Hold 'Em Stud. 1st Jackpot Casino has a generous comp policy for all players who use their Marquee Rewards card – just ask one of our friendly casino cashiers for more details

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eurofootball

BG
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Eurofootball Ltd. is the first Bulgarian bookmaker, and the first licensed in Bulgaria landbased operator with more than 20 years of history. Eurofootball Ltd confirms its leading position as the market leader as a result of consistent technological and innovation developing, building effective teams of experts and managers and the constant development and improvement of the national network of retail betting points. The company is the largest franchise chain in Bulgaria with almost 1 000 retailers across the country, employing nearly 3,000 trained people.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1st-jackpot-casino-tunica.jpeg
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurofootball.jpeg
Eurofootball
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eurofootball
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eurofootball in 2025.

Incident History — 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eurofootball (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eurofootball cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1st-jackpot-casino-tunica.jpeg
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurofootball.jpeg
Eurofootball
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eurofootball company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eurofootball company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company.

In the current year, Eurofootball company and 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eurofootball company nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eurofootball company nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eurofootball company nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company nor Eurofootball company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eurofootball holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eurofootball company.

Eurofootball company employs more people globally than 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eurofootball holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eurofootball holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eurofootball holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eurofootball holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eurofootball holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eurofootball holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H