Comparison Overview

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica

VS

Eldorado Resorts, Inc.

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica

1450 Jackpot Blvd, Robinsonville, 38664, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Your Closest Bet for Fun! 1st Jackpot Casino features the newest slots with hundreds of new ways to win with the most popular games. We also feature all of your favorite table games and a Tunica exclusive with Wild Hold 'Em Stud. 1st Jackpot Casino has a generous comp policy for all players who use their Marquee Rewards card – just ask one of our friendly casino cashiers for more details

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eldorado Resorts, Inc.

100 West Liberty Street, Reno, Nevada, 89501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Caesars Entertainment joins two successful gaming leaders, Caesars Entertainment and Eldorado Resorts, who have come together to create the largest and most diversified collection of destinations across the U.S. Boasting many of the world’s most prestigious gaming brands, including Caesars Palace®, Harrah’s®, Horseshoe®, Eldorado®, Silver Legacy®, Circus Circus® Reno and Tropicana®, among many others, we are the global leader in gaming and hospitality. While each of our over 55 world-class resorts offer its own unique amenities, all share a common goal of providing unparalleled family-style service and exhilarating experiences. Your Empire awaits.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 245
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1st-jackpot-casino-tunica.jpeg
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eldorado-resorts-inc-.jpeg
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eldorado Resorts, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1st-jackpot-casino-tunica.jpeg
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eldorado-resorts-inc-.jpeg
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Attack on IT support vendor
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party IT vendor breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company and Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has not reported any.

In the current year, Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company and 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company employs more people globally than 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H