Comparison Overview

1883 Magazine

VS

The New York Review of Books

1883 Magazine

undefined, London, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

1883 Magazine celebrates all that is new and exciting in the world of fashion, music, film + the arts. Born in West London in 2010, 1883 is an independently produced lifestyle biannual and online platform that showcases and promotes the most innovative new talent around. What began as a small fashion publication centred in-and-around London, has now evolved into an internationally distributed magazine that not only looks at fashion, but also delves into the worlds of music, film and the arts. This is the magazine where future talents reveal their thoughts, challenges and industry secrets. This is the magazine which captures the household names of tomorrow!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The New York Review of Books

207 East 32nd St, New York, NY, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

With a worldwide circulation of over 135,000, The New York Review of Books has established itself, in Esquire‘s words, as “the premier literary-intellectual magazine in the English language.” The New York Review began during the New York publishing strike of 1963, when its founding editors, Robert Silvers and Barbara Epstein, and their friends, decided to create a new kind of magazine—one in which the most interesting and qualified minds of our time would discuss current books and issues in depth. Just as importantly, it was determined that the Review should be an independent publication; it began life as an independent editorial voice and it remains independent today.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1883-magazine.jpeg
1883 Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-review-of-books.jpeg
The New York Review of Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
1883 Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The New York Review of Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1883 Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The New York Review of Books in 2025.

Incident History — 1883 Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

1883 Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The New York Review of Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The New York Review of Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1883-magazine.jpeg
1883 Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-review-of-books.jpeg
The New York Review of Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both 1883 Magazine company and The New York Review of Books company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The New York Review of Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 1883 Magazine company.

In the current year, The New York Review of Books company and 1883 Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The New York Review of Books company nor 1883 Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The New York Review of Books company nor 1883 Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The New York Review of Books company nor 1883 Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 1883 Magazine company nor The New York Review of Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 1883 Magazine nor The New York Review of Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 1883 Magazine company nor The New York Review of Books company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The New York Review of Books company employs more people globally than 1883 Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither 1883 Magazine nor The New York Review of Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 1883 Magazine nor The New York Review of Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 1883 Magazine nor The New York Review of Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 1883 Magazine nor The New York Review of Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 1883 Magazine nor The New York Review of Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 1883 Magazine nor The New York Review of Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.