Comparison Overview

15 Marketing Ltd

VS

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas

15 Marketing Ltd

40 Clarendon Road, Watford, undefined, WD171JJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

At 15 Marketing, we specialise in providing both marketing and development services to clients working in the online gaming industry, with the goal of helping them grow in this hyper-competitive market. From our inception in 2009, we’ve grown from having only a handful of clients to powering the marketing and technology behind hundreds of sites. We pride ourselves on being a hands-on agency that’s always looking to innovate, putting a focus on both constant improvement and holding ourselves to a high standard.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas

3355 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The Venetian® Resort Las Vegas is an important part of our global company, and a standard of luxury and service in the industry. We provide the best benefits, opportunity for advancement, and the greatest professionals with which to work. Our company culture is the result of our commitment to our guests, our Team Members, and our community. We are the world’s largest integrated resort, and our people make it the most successful as well.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 3,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/15marketingltd.jpeg
15 Marketing Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-venetian.jpeg
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
15 Marketing Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 15 Marketing Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Venetian Resort Las Vegas in 2025.

Incident History — 15 Marketing Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

15 Marketing Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Venetian Resort Las Vegas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/15marketingltd.jpeg
15 Marketing Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-venetian.jpeg
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 15 Marketing Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 15 Marketing Ltd company.

In the current year, The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company and 15 Marketing Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor 15 Marketing Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor 15 Marketing Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor 15 Marketing Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd company nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

15 Marketing Ltd company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company.

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company employs more people globally than 15 Marketing Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 15 Marketing Ltd nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H