Comparison Overview

12th Man Foundation

VS

Fox Creek

12th Man Foundation

P.O. Box 2800, College Station, TX, 77841, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20

As the fundraising organization and official ticket provider for Texas A&M Athletics, the 12th Man Foundation’s mission is to fund scholarships, programs and facilities in support of championship athletics. Our staff connects donors and ticket buyers with Aggie Athletics to help provide nearly 600 student-athletes with a world-class experience and ensure they are equipped to succeed in the classroom, in competition and in life.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fox Creek

1402 Jones St, Omaha, Nebraska, 68102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The mission of Fox Creek is to provide affordable, quality fundraising services with a personal touch to nonprofits seeking to grow and/or sustain their revenue. Through a team of professionals, Fox Creek offers the following services: grant writing and proposal development, fundraising consulting, marketing and graphic design, technical and report writing fundraising appeals and letters of inquiry, as well as workshops.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/12th-man-foundation.jpeg
12th Man Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-creek.jpeg
Fox Creek
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
12th Man Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fox Creek
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 12th Man Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fox Creek in 2025.

Incident History — 12th Man Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

12th Man Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fox Creek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fox Creek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/12th-man-foundation.jpeg
12th Man Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-creek.jpeg
Fox Creek
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fox Creek company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 12th Man Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fox Creek company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 12th Man Foundation company.

In the current year, Fox Creek company and 12th Man Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fox Creek company nor 12th Man Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fox Creek company nor 12th Man Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fox Creek company nor 12th Man Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 12th Man Foundation company nor Fox Creek company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 12th Man Foundation nor Fox Creek holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 12th Man Foundation company nor Fox Creek company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

12th Man Foundation company employs more people globally than Fox Creek company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither 12th Man Foundation nor Fox Creek holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 12th Man Foundation nor Fox Creek holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 12th Man Foundation nor Fox Creek holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 12th Man Foundation nor Fox Creek holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 12th Man Foundation nor Fox Creek holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 12th Man Foundation nor Fox Creek holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N