Comparison Overview

101 Network

VS

Editora FÓRUM

101 Network

4225 Executive Dr, San Diego, California, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The 101 Network is a digital publishing platform that delivers a daily dose of knowledge. We believe in the power to inform and entertain. It debuted in 2018 with four verticals — History, Finance, Science, and Living — with a blueprint for rapidly expanding the vertical collection. Redefining what it means to learn, our vision takes unique audience-targeting abilities and combines it with informative stories that have mass appeal. We are convinced that the most entertaining content comes from well-rounded experts and relentlessly seek new ways to innovate your academia intake. So you can stay knowledgeable on just about any subject.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Editora FÓRUM

Rua Paulo Ribeiro Bastos 211, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31710-430, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Com o objetivo de oferecer os melhores títulos do segmento editorial jurídico, a Editora Fórum especializou-se no gênero do Direito Público e encontra-se, hoje, em lugar de destaque no mercado.A empresa, presidida pelo Dr. Luis Cláudio Rodrigues Ferreira, está em atuação desde 1992. Nesse período já foram publicados mais de 500 títulos, reunindo cerca de 1500 autores. Além disso, é a Editora que mais publica periódicos na área de Direito Público no país, mantendo atualmente 21 periódicos, sendo 5 projetos customizados.Em seus livros e periódicos estão presentes estudos de Doutrina e Jurisprudência nas áreas do Direito Administrativo, Ambiental, Constitucional, Disciplinar, Econômico, Eleitoral, de Estado, Financeiro, Internacional, Municipal, Previdenciário, Processual, Regulatório, Sanitário, das Telecomunicações, do Terceiro Setor, Urbanístico e Tributário

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/101network.jpeg
101 Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editora-f-rum-ltda.jpeg
Editora FÓRUM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
101 Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Editora FÓRUM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 101 Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Editora FÓRUM in 2025.

Incident History — 101 Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

101 Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Editora FÓRUM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Editora FÓRUM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/101network.jpeg
101 Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editora-f-rum-ltda.jpeg
Editora FÓRUM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Editora FÓRUM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 101 Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Editora FÓRUM company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 101 Network company.

In the current year, Editora FÓRUM company and 101 Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Editora FÓRUM company nor 101 Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Editora FÓRUM company nor 101 Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Editora FÓRUM company nor 101 Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 101 Network company nor Editora FÓRUM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 101 Network nor Editora FÓRUM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Editora FÓRUM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to 101 Network company.

Editora FÓRUM company employs more people globally than 101 Network company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither 101 Network nor Editora FÓRUM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 101 Network nor Editora FÓRUM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 101 Network nor Editora FÓRUM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 101 Network nor Editora FÓRUM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 101 Network nor Editora FÓRUM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 101 Network nor Editora FÓRUM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.