Comparison Overview

TDS®

VS

Airtel Africa

TDS®

8401 Greenway Boulevard, Suite 230, Middleton, WI, US, 53562
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

Telephone and Data Systems (TDS) provides wireless products and services; cable and wireline broadband, TV and voice services to approximately 5.5 million customers nationwide. The TDS companies share a strong commitment to customer satisfaction by offering the highest-quality services and products and excellent customer support. UScellular® UScellular, headquartered in Chicago, IL, provides a comprehensive range of wireless services and products, excellent customer support, and a high-quality network to 5 million customers nationwide. UScellular is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under USM. TDS Telecommunications Corp.® TDS Telecommunications Corp., headquartered in Madison, WI, provides high-speed Internet, phone and TV entertainment services, as well as VoIP business solutions, to customers in rural, suburban and metropolitan communities nationwide. Suttle-Straus® Suttle-Straus provides comprehensive marketing solutions including creative design, mailing, fulfillment, distribution, displays, signage, promotional products, conventional and digital printing.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 3,529
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Airtel Africa

The Oval, Ringroad Parklands, Nairobi, Nairobi, KE, 00100
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Airtel Africa is a leading provider of telecommunications and mobile money services, with a presence in 14 countries in Africa, primarily in East Africa and Central and West Africa. Airtel Africa offers an integrated suite of telecommunications solutions to its subscribers, including mobile voice and data services as well as mobile money services both nationally and internationally. The Group aims to continue providing a simple and intuitive customer experience through streamlined customer journeys

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 14,896
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-tds-.jpeg
TDS®
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airtel-africa.jpeg
Airtel Africa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TDS®
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Airtel Africa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TDS® in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airtel Africa in 2025.

Incident History — TDS® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TDS® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Airtel Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airtel Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-tds-.jpeg
TDS®
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airtel-africa.jpeg
Airtel Africa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Airtel Africa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TDS® company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TDS® company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Airtel Africa company has not reported any.

In the current year, Airtel Africa company and TDS® company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Airtel Africa company nor TDS® company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TDS® company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Airtel Africa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Airtel Africa company nor TDS® company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TDS® company nor Airtel Africa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TDS® nor Airtel Africa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Airtel Africa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TDS® company.

Airtel Africa company employs more people globally than TDS® company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither TDS® nor Airtel Africa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TDS® nor Airtel Africa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TDS® nor Airtel Africa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TDS® nor Airtel Africa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TDS® nor Airtel Africa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TDS® nor Airtel Africa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L