Comparison Overview

'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i

VS

New Art Center

'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i

600 'Imiloa Place, Hilo, Hawaii, 96720, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.imiloahawaii.org

‘Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai‘i is a world-class informal science education center located on the University of Hawai‘i at Hilo campus. ‘Imiloa is a place of life-long learning where the power of Hawai‘i’s cultural traditions, its legacy of exploration and the wonders of astronomy come together to provide inspiration and hope for generations. The Center’s interactive exhibits, 3D full dome planetarium, native landscape, and programs and events engage children, families, visitors and the local community in the wonders of science and technology found in Hawai‘i.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

New Art Center

61 Washington Park, None, Newton, Massachusetts, US, 02460
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newartcenter.org

The New Art Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting artistic creation and education through classes, exhibitions and public programs. At the New Art Center, we nurture children's creativity, encourage emerging artists, develop teaching opportunities and enrich the community through exhibitions. The Center educates over 1,800 students annually in classes and workshops, sustains a faculty of 40 professional artists, and operates one of the few mid-sized nonprofit exhibition spaces in New England. Our goals include increasing the understanding of the intellectual and practical tasks of creating art through hands-on experience, and expanding access to original works of art.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/'imiloa-astronomy-center.jpeg
'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-art-center.jpeg
New Art Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Art Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Art Center in 2026.

Incident History — 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i (X = Date, Y = Severity)

'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Art Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Art Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/'imiloa-astronomy-center.jpeg
'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-art-center.jpeg
New Art Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company and New Art Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, New Art Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company.

In the current year, New Art Center company and 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Art Center company nor 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Art Center company nor 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Art Center company nor 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company nor New Art Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor New Art Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company nor New Art Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New Art Center company employs more people globally than 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor New Art Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor New Art Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor New Art Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor New Art Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor New Art Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor New Art Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References