Comparison Overview

Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

VS

Mars

Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

徐汇区南宁路970号李锦记大厦22F、23F、25F, 上海市, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1888 , Lee Kum Kee is an international household name in authentic Asian sauces and condiments , as well as "a symbol of quality and trust". As a globally renowned Chinese multinational corporation , Lee Kum Kee now offers over 200 types of sauce and condiment to over 100 countries and regions.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 10,557
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mars

6885 Elm St, McLean, Virginia, US, 22101
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

We’re a unified force of 150,000+ Associates, taking action every day toward the world we want tomorrow. Our Five Principles have kept us true to ourselves and to our commitment to treat others in ways that are consistent with those values. Having stood the test of time, these principles will continue, keeping us free to move quickly and plan for the future. Quality - The consumer is our boss, quality is our work and value for money is our goal. Responsibility - As individuals, we demand total responsibility from ourselves; as Associates, we support the responsibilities of others. Mutuality - A mutual benefit is a shared benefit; a shared benefit will endure. Efficiency - We use resources to the full, waste nothing and do only what we can do best. Freedom - We need freedom to shape our future; we need profit to remain free. Note to Parents: https://www.mars.com/about/policies-and-practices/note-to-parents/np-english For more information, please visit mars.com. Follow us: facebook.com/mars, twitter.com/marsglobal, instagram.com/marsglobal/, youtube.com/mars For more information about careers at Mars, please visit careers.mars.com Follow us: facebook.com/LifeAtMars, instagram.com/LifeAtMars/, tiktok.com/LifeAtMars Mars, Incorporated is not responsible for any content or activity made available via third party sites or services. Page subject to: mars.com/legal mars.com/privacy

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 57,914
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/李锦记(中国)销售有限公司.jpeg
Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mars.jpeg
Mars
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mars
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mars in 2025.

Incident History — Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/李锦记(中国)销售有限公司.jpeg
Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mars.jpeg
Mars
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mars company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mars company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company.

In the current year, Mars company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mars company nor Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mars company nor Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mars company nor Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company nor Mars company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited nor Mars holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mars company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company.

Mars company employs more people globally than Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Manufacturing.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited nor Mars holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited nor Mars holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited nor Mars holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited nor Mars holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited nor Mars holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited nor Mars holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H