Comparison Overview

Acer Cyber Security Inc.

VS

CrowdStrike

Acer Cyber Security Inc.

忠孝東路4段563號8F, None, 台北市, 台灣, TW, 110
Last Update: 2025-06-13 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Acer Cyber Security Inc. (ACSI) is founded in 2000, We provide professional digital information management services for businesses. ACSI has been performing services in a global scale for years. With integrated maintenance capabilities of Data Center Hotel, Network, Disaster Recovery and Security Services, ACSI also dedicated to develop all sorts of solutions in response to the growing use of cloud services and big data. ACSI aims to quickly import various products into the market, offer our customer the best suitable solution. ACSI has dedicated in the cyber security business for years, and become the leader in the industry. Not only we’re capable to construct the complete SOC platform and technology but also is the most experienced SOC service provider with the most operating forces, clients, and covering the most extensive range. ACSI is also granted with ISO 17025 laboratory certification. We are the only one devoted with self-built SOC digital forensic center in the country. With this facility, we are able to monitor unusual security activities through the SOC services beforehand, and cope with forensic services; by enforcing these procedures, we’re able to provide our client a thorough cyber security solution. Aside of government agencies, ACSI also provides services in various industry, such as the financial securities’ sector, insurances, manufacturing, logistic business also e-commerce companies, and so forth. Currently, the four major categories of ACSI services include security management, security monitoring, security auditing and Information sharing and OT security management service.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 161
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

CrowdStrike

None, None, Remote, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-09-16 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-class AI, the CrowdStrike Falcon® platform leverages real-time indicators of attack, threat intelligence, evolving adversary tradecraft and enriched telemetry from across the enterprise to deliver hyper-accurate detections, automated protection and remediation, elite threat hunting and prioritized observability of vulnerabilities. Purpose-built in the cloud with a single lightweight-agent architecture, the Falcon platform delivers rapid and scalable deployment, superior protection and performance, reduced complexity and immediate time-to-value. CrowdStrike: We stop breaches.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,426
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/安碁資訊股份有限公司.jpeg
Acer Cyber Security Inc.
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Acer Cyber Security Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CrowdStrike
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acer Cyber Security Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

CrowdStrike has 640.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Acer Cyber Security Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acer Cyber Security Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CrowdStrike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CrowdStrike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/安碁資訊股份有限公司.jpeg
Acer Cyber Security Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Windows Named Pipe permissions
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: compromised npm packages, malicious dependency injection, post-install script execution
Motivation: credential harvesting, unauthorized access, potential follow-on attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Process Suspension
Motivation: Bypass Detection Mechanisms
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake job postings and malicious downloads
Motivation: Cryptomining
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CrowdStrike company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Acer Cyber Security Inc. company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

CrowdStrike company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Acer Cyber Security Inc. company.

In the current year, CrowdStrike company has reported more cyber incidents than Acer Cyber Security Inc. company.

Acer Cyber Security Inc. company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CrowdStrike company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both CrowdStrike company and Acer Cyber Security Inc. company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

CrowdStrike company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Acer Cyber Security Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Acer Cyber Security Inc. company and CrowdStrike company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Acer Cyber Security Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CrowdStrike company.

CrowdStrike company employs more people globally than Acer Cyber Security Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer and Network Security.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N