Comparison Overview

'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i

VS

10-31 Inc.

'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i

600 'Imiloa Place, Hilo, Hawaii, 96720, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

‘Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai‘i is a world-class informal science education center located on the University of Hawai‘i at Hilo campus. ‘Imiloa is a place of life-long learning where the power of Hawai‘i’s cultural traditions, its legacy of exploration and the wonders of astronomy come together to provide inspiration and hope for generations. The Center’s interactive exhibits, 3D full dome planetarium, native landscape, and programs and events engage children, families, visitors and the local community in the wonders of science and technology found in Hawai‘i.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

10-31 Inc.

2 West Crisman Rd., Columbia, New Jersey, 07832, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

10-31 Incorporated was created in 1985 by Bill Stender when he saw the need for custom mounts that had the ability to hold priceless items without taking away from their uniqueness. Five years later, Bill created 10-31 Cabinetry after being asked by many to design and build custom cabinetry. Creative excellence and quality workmanship were a given, but how to scale against individually focused creative executions became the bigger question. The answer came three years later in the form of Art Display Essentials. ADE focused on small to medium size display components that could be created in-house and manufactured in mass production. This business model, different than the first two divisions, produced volume sales at much lower price points. Opportunity again presented itself in 2012 when a vendor selling easels needed an exit strategy and sold his business to 10-31. This business fit nicely within the Art Display Essentials division under the Easels by Amron brand. 2013 brought a wonderful new product into the 10-31 fold. Designed and developed with son Evan, the Q-cord was introduced to the market and answered the need for an aesthetically pleasing retractable barrier system. Several other products such as MuseumRails, MuseumSigns, Q-Cord Art Stanchions, and Museum Display cases used by high-end collectors and museums fall under the 10-31 umbrella. 10-31 continues to grow from a simple shop in Wharton, NJ to a company where there are no boundaries either in the degree of a project’s difficulty or its geographical location.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/'imiloa-astronomy-center.jpeg
'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/10-31-inc..jpeg
10-31 Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
10-31 Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 10-31 Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i (X = Date, Y = Severity)

'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 10-31 Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

10-31 Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/'imiloa-astronomy-center.jpeg
'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/10-31-inc..jpeg
10-31 Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

10-31 Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 10-31 Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company.

In the current year, 10-31 Inc. company and 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 10-31 Inc. company nor 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 10-31 Inc. company nor 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 10-31 Inc. company nor 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company nor 10-31 Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor 10-31 Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company nor 10-31 Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i company employs more people globally than 10-31 Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor 10-31 Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor 10-31 Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor 10-31 Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor 10-31 Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor 10-31 Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 'Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawai'i nor 10-31 Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N