Comparison Overview

Washtenaw County

VS

United States Postal Service

Washtenaw County

220 N Main St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Washtenaw County is a local government agency located in southeast Michigan, covering an area of 720 square miles. Its 27 cities, villages and townships are home to about 354,000 citizens in urban, suburban, and rural settings. This mix of different settings provides many opportunities for: •Agricultural •Business •Education •Home life •Recreation The two largest cities are Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti, homes to two large universities - the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and Eastern Michigan University in Ypsilanti.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 1,114
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, D.C., 20260, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 650 and 699

As the United States Postal Service continues its evolution as a forward-thinking, fast-acting company capable of providing quality products and services for its customers, it continues to remember and celebrate its roots as the first national network of communications that literally bound a nation together. Ours is a proud heritage built on a simple yet profound mission: Bind the nation together. Connect every American, every door, every business, everywhere through the simple act of delivering mail and packages. This idea of universal service is at the heart of the $1.4 trillion industry that employs more than 7.5 million people and drives commerce, plays an integral part in every American community and remains the greatest value of any post in the world. The Postal Service delivers more mail to more addresses in a larger geographical area than any other post in the world. The Postal Service delivers to more than 157 million addresses in every state, city and town in this country. Everyone living in the United States and its territories has access to postal products and services and pays the same postage regardless of their location. The Postal Service receives no tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations. Facebook: www.facebook.com/usps Twitter: www.twitter.com/usps Instagram: www.instagram.com/uspostalservice Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/uspsstamps YouTube: www.youtube.com/usps Corporate Blog: www.uspsblog.com This profile, while affiliated with the U.S. Postal Service®, is not an official customer service page. Please use one of the methods described below to receive assistance. Get help on twitter @USPSHelp or call 800-275-8777or go to go.usa.gov/help Thank you

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 142,734
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washtenaw-county.jpeg
Washtenaw County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usps.jpeg
United States Postal Service
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Washtenaw County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
United States Postal Service
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washtenaw County in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

United States Postal Service has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Washtenaw County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washtenaw County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — United States Postal Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Postal Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washtenaw-county.jpeg
Washtenaw County
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Local Government Computers
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usps.jpeg
United States Postal Service
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Motivation: Financial Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Smishing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Washtenaw County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to United States Postal Service company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

United States Postal Service company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Washtenaw County company.

In the current year, United States Postal Service company has reported more cyber incidents than Washtenaw County company.

Neither United States Postal Service company nor Washtenaw County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

United States Postal Service company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Washtenaw County company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both United States Postal Service company and Washtenaw County company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Washtenaw County company nor United States Postal Service company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Washtenaw County nor United States Postal Service holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

United States Postal Service company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Washtenaw County company.

United States Postal Service company employs more people globally than Washtenaw County company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Washtenaw County nor United States Postal Service holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor United States Postal Service holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor United States Postal Service holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor United States Postal Service holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor United States Postal Service holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor United States Postal Service holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X