Comparison Overview

Washtenaw County

VS

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Washtenaw County

220 N Main St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Washtenaw County is a local government agency located in southeast Michigan, covering an area of 720 square miles. Its 27 cities, villages and townships are home to about 354,000 citizens in urban, suburban, and rural settings. This mix of different settings provides many opportunities for: •Agricultural •Business •Education •Home life •Recreation The two largest cities are Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti, homes to two large universities - the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and Eastern Michigan University in Ypsilanti.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 1,114
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

24 Beacon Street, None, Boston, MA, US, 02133
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Year after year, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has continued to pioneer bold legislative actions and programs, some of which have been embraced on a national scale. We are always looking for talented individuals to help us maintain this momentum and improve the services that millions of people depend on every day. If you’re looking for an innovative work environment where you can really make a difference, check out the job opportunities with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This page is managed according to the Mass.gov social media policy: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgov-social-media-policy. Comments that do not follow our policy may be removed.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,463
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washtenaw-county.jpeg
Washtenaw County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Washtenaw County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washtenaw County in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2025.

Incident History — Washtenaw County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washtenaw County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Commonwealth of Massachusetts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commonwealth of Massachusetts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washtenaw-county.jpeg
Washtenaw County
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Local Government Computers
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Washtenaw County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Washtenaw County company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has not reported any.

In the current year, Commonwealth of Massachusetts company and Washtenaw County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts company nor Washtenaw County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts company nor Washtenaw County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Washtenaw County company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Washtenaw County company nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Washtenaw County nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Washtenaw County company.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company employs more people globally than Washtenaw County company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Washtenaw County nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Washtenaw County nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X