Comparison Overview

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc

VS

Pulse Secure

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc

undefined, undefined, undefined, 95825, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vms-inc.net

VMS was formally incorporated in the first quarter of 2007 in response to growing demand from the alarm industry to proactively offer a better solution than traditional alarm monitoring. Over the years we have streamlined an effective dispatch plan through the integration of an alarm system with LIVE video surveillance creating Visual Verification of events occurring at our armed facilities. These triggered events are monitored in real-time from a remote Central Station, and in turn, patrols are dispatched during the incident. Services: * CCTV consulting, planning and implementation. * Reseller and Integrator of IP Video Surveillance Systems. (Bolide, Samsung, Arecont, Exacq, SerVision) * Live Video Monitoring and Alarmed Secuirty Video Verification with dispatch services.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pulse Secure

2700 Zanker Road, Suite #200, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 650 and 699
http://pulsesecure.net/

Pulse Secure provides easy, comprehensive software-driven Secure Access solutions that provide visibility and seamless, protected connectivity between users, devices, things, and services. Our suites uniquely integrate cloud, mobile, application, and network access to enable hybrid IT in a Zero Trust world. Today, more than 80% of the Fortune 500 and over 20,000 enterprises (and 18M end-points) and service providers across every vertical entrust Pulse Secure to empower their mobile workforce to securely access applications and information in the data center and cloud while ensuring business compliance.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/video-monitoring-solutions-inc.jpeg
Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulse-secure.jpeg
Pulse Secure
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pulse Secure
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

Pulse Secure has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pulse Secure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pulse Secure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/video-monitoring-solutions-inc.jpeg
Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulse-secure.jpeg
Pulse Secure
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Remote Exploitation (69% of CVEs), Remote Code Execution (30% of CVEs), Social Engineering (ClickFix/FileFix), BYOI (Bring-Your-Own-Installer), JIT Hooking, Memory Injection
Motivation: Geopolitical (state-sponsored: 53%), Financial gain (theft/fraud: 27%; ransomware: 20%)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities
Motivation: Espionage and Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local (Authenticated)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pulse Secure company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pulse Secure company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has not reported any.

In the current year, Pulse Secure company has reported more cyber incidents than Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company.

Pulse Secure company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Pulse Secure company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pulse Secure company nor Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Pulse Secure company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc nor Pulse Secure holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pulse Secure company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company.

Pulse Secure company employs more people globally than Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc nor Pulse Secure holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc nor Pulse Secure holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc nor Pulse Secure holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc nor Pulse Secure holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc nor Pulse Secure holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Video Monitoring Solutions, Inc nor Pulse Secure holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References