Comparison Overview

Uitgeverij Podium

VS

Us Weekly

Uitgeverij Podium

Amsterdam, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Uitgeverij Podium werd in 1997 opgericht door Joost Nijsen, mede mogelijk gemaakt door de loyaliteit van Nederlandse auteurs die hij eerder uitgaf bij Nijgh & Van Ditmar en Balans, zoals Herman Franke, Ronald Giphart, Nicolaas Klei, Manon Uphoff en Henk van Woerden. Podium is vanaf de oprichting een zelfstandige uitgeverij, gespecialiseerd in hedendaagse Nederlandse en vertaalde literatuur (proza, poëzie) en literaire en journalistieke non-fictie. Dankzij een selectieve fondsvorming en beheerste titelproductie, kan door het enthousiaste en deskundige team aan de uitgegeven titels veel zorg worden besteed, zowel aan redactie en productie als aan verkoop en marketing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Us Weekly

1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, 10104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Us Weekly is a leading pop culture resource covering entertainment, style, beauty and healthy lifestyle, all through the lens of celebrity. The media brand's unparalleled access results in breaking celebrity stories with credibility and authority, in real-time. The brand boasts nearly 50 million in audience across its multi-platform portfolio, including a top 10 position among all magazines, and one of the top ranking websites for entertainment and celebrity news with 27 million unique visitors.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverij-podium.jpeg
Uitgeverij Podium
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-weekly.jpeg
Us Weekly
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Uitgeverij Podium
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Us Weekly
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Uitgeverij Podium in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Us Weekly in 2025.

Incident History — Uitgeverij Podium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Uitgeverij Podium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Us Weekly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Us Weekly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverij-podium.jpeg
Uitgeverij Podium
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-weekly.jpeg
Us Weekly
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Uitgeverij Podium company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Us Weekly company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Us Weekly company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Uitgeverij Podium company.

In the current year, Us Weekly company and Uitgeverij Podium company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Us Weekly company nor Uitgeverij Podium company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Us Weekly company nor Uitgeverij Podium company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Us Weekly company nor Uitgeverij Podium company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium company nor Us Weekly company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium nor Us Weekly holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Us Weekly company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Uitgeverij Podium company.

Us Weekly company employs more people globally than Uitgeverij Podium company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium nor Us Weekly holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium nor Us Weekly holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium nor Us Weekly holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium nor Us Weekly holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium nor Us Weekly holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium nor Us Weekly holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.