Comparison Overview

Tria Designs, Inc.

VS

Glyphics Ltd

Tria Designs, Inc.

600 Congress Ave, Austin, Texas, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

It is likely that your business or department is seeking to "do more with less."​ If your department or business is interested in continuing to produce high-quality communications, but can no longer afford firm or agency rates, then we can help. Contact us today to discuss how we can work together to ensure your continued success. Tria Designs. Agency quality work at an affordable price.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Glyphics Ltd

75 Leonard Street, London, EC2A 4QS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

We’re signmakers with a difference. With a background in type design, graphics, branding, typesetting and traditional craft skills means we look at everything with a designer’s eye. No wonder architects, interior designers and design agencies say they like working with us. From supersize wall vinyls to small office plaques, we create signs for all situations and we'll advise and design the right sign solution for you.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tria-designs-&-affinity-consultants.jpeg
Tria Designs, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glyphics-ltd.jpeg
Glyphics Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tria Designs, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glyphics Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tria Designs, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glyphics Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Tria Designs, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tria Designs, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glyphics Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glyphics Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tria-designs-&-affinity-consultants.jpeg
Tria Designs, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glyphics-ltd.jpeg
Glyphics Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glyphics Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tria Designs, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Glyphics Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tria Designs, Inc. company.

In the current year, Glyphics Ltd company and Tria Designs, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glyphics Ltd company nor Tria Designs, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glyphics Ltd company nor Tria Designs, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glyphics Ltd company nor Tria Designs, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. company nor Glyphics Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. nor Glyphics Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. company nor Glyphics Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Glyphics Ltd company employs more people globally than Tria Designs, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. nor Glyphics Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. nor Glyphics Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. nor Glyphics Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. nor Glyphics Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. nor Glyphics Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tria Designs, Inc. nor Glyphics Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X