ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Tinexta is an industrial Group that offers innovative solutions for the digital transformation and growth of companies, professionals and institutions. Listed on the Euronext STAR Milan, it is included in the European Tech Leader index as a high-growth tech company. Based in Italy and present in 9 countries from Europe to Latin America with over 2,000 employees, Tinexta is active in the strategic Digital Trust, Cyber Security and Business Innovation sectors.

TINEXTA S.P.A. A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

TINEXTA S.P.A.

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

tinexta

Employees number:

2,198

Number of followers:

27,400

NAICS:

5415

Industry Type:

IT Services and IT Consulting

Homepage:

tinexta.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

TIN_1842742

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreTINEXTA S.P.A. Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tinexta.jpeg
TINEXTA S.P.A. IT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreTINEXTA S.P.A. Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tinexta.jpeg
TINEXTA S.P.A. IT Services and IT Consulting
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

TINEXTA S.P.A.

Fair
Current Score
751
Baa (Fair)
01000
1 incidents
-2.0 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

DECEMBER 2025
751
NOVEMBER 2025
753
Vulnerability
17 Nov 2025 • Tinexta InfoCert S.p.A.
Critical Vulnerabilities in GoSign Desktop Allow Man-in-the-Middle Attacks and Arbitrary Code Execution

A critical security vulnerability was discovered in **GoSign Desktop**, a widely used electronic signature solution by Tinexta InfoCert. The flaws include **disabled TLS certificate validation** and an **unverified update mechanism**, enabling attackers to intercept sensitive data (e.g., credentials, documents, authentication tokens) via man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks or deliver malicious updates. Since GoSign Desktop is often deployed in **government agencies, enterprises, and legal workflows**—sometimes with **administrator-level privileges**—exploitation could lead to **document tampering, fraud, or legal liability**. The lack of public patches or remediation timelines from InfoCert exacerbates the risk, leaving organizations exposed unless they implement compensating controls (e.g., network isolation, migration to the SaaS version). The vulnerability undermines trust in digital signature workflows, particularly in sectors where **legally binding documents** are processed.

751
critical -2
TIN4992049111725
Vulnerability Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack Risk Arbitrary Code Execution Risk
Network-based (MitM) Unverified Software Updates
Improper TLS Certificate Validation (CWE-295) Unverified Update Mechanism (Lack of Code Signing)
Credentials Authentication Tokens Digitally Signed Documents Sensitive Business/Government Data GoSign Desktop (Windows/macOS/Linux - assumed) Potential fraud via manipulated digital signatures Legal liability from compromised documents Loss of trust in electronic signature workflows High (trust in digital signature provider eroded) Potential loss of government/enterprise contracts Fraudulent transactions Regulatory non-compliance for digital signatures Contract disputes High (if credentials intercepted)
Disconnect GoSign Desktop from internet-facing services Restrict network access of the application Monitor for unexpected update activity Transition to SaaS version (if feasible) Recommended as mitigation Recommended for update activity
Potential: Credentials Authentication Tokens Digitally Signed Documents High (legally binding digital signatures) Confidential business/government documents Possible via MitM attacks TLS encryption bypassed due to validation flaw Digital signature files PDF/Document formats (assumed) Potential (if documents contain PII)
Potential: eIDAS Regulation (EU No 910/2014) Local data protection laws (if PII exposed)
Critical importance of TLS certificate validation in security-sensitive applications Mandatory code signing for software updates, especially in high-trust contexts Need for transparent vulnerability disclosure and patch timelines Risks of desktop applications in regulated workflows (vs. SaaS alternatives)
Immediate: Isolate GoSign Desktop from untrusted networks Short-term: Migrate to SaaS version (QC2-certified) where possible Long-term: Implement rigorous code signing and TLS validation in development lifecycle Policy: Require third-party audits for electronic signature software Architectural: Prefer zero-trust models for high-value document workflows
Ongoing (no public patch timeline from vendor)
Urgent: Avoid using GoSign Desktop until patched Verify all digitally signed documents created during vulnerability window
Recommended: Notify all GoSign Desktop users of risks Coordinate with legal teams on signature validity
Network interception (MitM) Compromised update server Potential via malicious updates Digitally signed contracts Government/legal documents Financial approvals Possible if credentials/documents exfiltrated
Lack of TLS certificate validation in network communications Absence of cryptographic verification for software updates Insufficient secure coding practices for high-trust application Delayed public disclosure and patching process Implement proper TLS certificate validation (RFC 5280 compliance) Enforce code signing for all update packages Conduct third-party security audit of GoSign Desktop Establish transparent vulnerability management process
OCTOBER 2025
753
SEPTEMBER 2025
753
AUGUST 2025
753
JULY 2025
753
JUNE 2025
753
MAY 2025
753
APRIL 2025
753
MARCH 2025
753
FEBRUARY 2025
753
JANUARY 2025
753

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for TINEXTA S.P.A. is 751, which corresponds to a Fair rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for April 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for January 2025 was 753.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on TINEXTA S.P.A.’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -2.0 points.

You can access TINEXTA S.P.A.’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/tinexta.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view TINEXTA S.P.A.’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/tinexta.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.