Comparison Overview

The Works Museum

VS

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid

The Works Museum

9740 Grand Ave S, Bloomington, MN, 55420, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to inspire the next generation of innovators, engineers, and creative problem solvers. Our exhibits, programs, and design challenges engage kids in science, technology, and engineering and make learning memorable and fun. Dreams need doing, and exploring engineering gives a child the power to make stuff, break stuff, and make it better! We need the imagination and skill of engineers to solve the problems and address the challenges of our modern world. Engineering fuels collaboration, persistence, and problem solving; critical skills for every child from every walk of life. The Works Museum welcomes you to explore engineering and stretch your imagination.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid

Media Park, Media Parkboulevard 1, Hilversum, Noord Holland, NL, 1217 WE
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Netherlands Institute for Sound & Vision (Sound & Vision) maintains and provides access to over 70 per cent of the Dutch audio-visual heritage, comprising more than one million hours of television, radio, music and film, making it one of the largest audiovisual archives in Europe. Sound & Vision combines the highest professional standards concerning the release and storage of material, with easy access for its users, by using state of the art systems for asset management and storage. Sound & Vision is the business archive of the national broadcasting corporations as well as a cultural heritage institute. Sound & Vision has brought thousands of hours of archive footage on-line for educational use and also operates a facility for the general public, the Media Experience, which is visited by 200,000 people annually. In 2007, the seven-year Images for the Future programme was launched. The project, funded with a budget of €154 million from the FES Fund, will realise the digitisation of the Netherlands’ audiovisual memory in a process whereby Sound & Vision will conserve and digitise 17,500 hours of film, 124,000 hours of audio, 137,000 hours of video and 1.2 million photos. This material will be made available for (broadcast) professionals, education and the general public. In the scope of this project, Sound & Vision is experimenting with crowdsourcing.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 352
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-works-museum.jpeg
The Works Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beeld-en-geluid.jpeg
Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Works Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Works Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid in 2025.

Incident History — The Works Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Works Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-works-museum.jpeg
The Works Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beeld-en-geluid.jpeg
Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Works Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Works Museum company.

In the current year, Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company and The Works Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company nor The Works Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company nor The Works Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company nor The Works Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Works Museum company nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Works Museum nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Works Museum company.

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company employs more people globally than The Works Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Works Museum nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X