Comparison Overview

UIC Law Review

VS

Jones Publishing Inc.

UIC Law Review

315 S Plymouth Ct, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The UIC Law Review is one of the oldest and most respected honors programs at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law. Membership in The Law Review enhances research, writing and editing skills and provides excellent training for the practice of law. The Law Review‘s purpose is to publish scholarly works on a broad range of legal topics in four issues each year. The publication includes works written by judges, legal scholars, noted practitioners, and University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law students.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jones Publishing Inc.

N7528 Aanstad Rd, Iola, WI, 54945, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Jones Publishing publishes nine company-owned magazine titles, two custom publications, serves three member organizations, hosts multiple websites, discussion boards, and produces several newsletters. In addition, Jones Publishing offers several custom publishing options for companies who want to expand their marketing efforts and increase their influence with customers. The daily mission at Jones Publishing is to deliver the most vital information for each community of readers in order to promote the growth of the companies who serve those communities. Each member of the JP team adds a unique contribution to the mission and is continually striving to give you nothing less than the highest quality in publishing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-john-marshall-law-review.jpeg
UIC Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-publishing-inc..jpeg
Jones Publishing Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UIC Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jones Publishing Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UIC Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jones Publishing Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — UIC Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UIC Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jones Publishing Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jones Publishing Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-john-marshall-law-review.jpeg
UIC Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-publishing-inc..jpeg
Jones Publishing Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jones Publishing Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UIC Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jones Publishing Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to UIC Law Review company.

In the current year, Jones Publishing Inc. company and UIC Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jones Publishing Inc. company nor UIC Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jones Publishing Inc. company nor UIC Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jones Publishing Inc. company nor UIC Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UIC Law Review company nor Jones Publishing Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UIC Law Review nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither UIC Law Review company nor Jones Publishing Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UIC Law Review company employs more people globally than Jones Publishing Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither UIC Law Review nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UIC Law Review nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UIC Law Review nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UIC Law Review nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UIC Law Review nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UIC Law Review nor Jones Publishing Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.