Comparison Overview

The George Washington Law Review

VS

Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press

The George Washington Law Review

2028 G St NW, Washington, 20052, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gwlr.org

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘎𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘓𝘢𝘸 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸 is a nationally renowned, student-run publication at the George Washington University Law School. The 𝘓𝘢𝘸 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸 publishes six issues a year, including an Annual Review of Administrative Law and a Symposium issue. Our online publication, 𝘈𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘰, is focused on constitutional and federal law and offers a truncated publication timeline to meet the fast-paced demand of online publication. The 𝘓𝘢𝘸 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸 also manages a Supreme Court-focused blog, 𝘖𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘵. 𝘖𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘵 provides previews of the Supreme Court oral arguments and responses to the opinions handed down in those cases. Previews are crafted by the online team, and responses are crafted by professors and practitioners whose scholarship is relevant to the issue before the Court. Students & Alumni Group: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13951130/ Senior Editorial Board, Vol. 94 Editor-in-Chief | Tegan V. Oliver Senior Managing Editor | Read Brown Senior Executive Editor | Grant Shenkman Senior Production Editor | Rhyia Bibby Senior Articles Editor | Daniel Hopkins Senior Notes Editor | Brian Zilberberg Senior Online Editor | Benjamin J. Heidloff Senior Projects Editor | Sara E. Kim Senior Membership & Development Editor | Darrell Black

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press

Crooked Lane Books, New York, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crookedlanebooks.com

Founded in 2015, Crooked Lane Books is an independent publisher that strives to entertain the many readers of commercial crime fiction. Alcove Press, an imprint of Crooked Lane, is dedicated to publishing upmarket book club fiction. Both are responsive to readers’ interests and agile within the industry to bring our authors’ titles to the widest possible audience.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-george-washington-law-review.jpeg
The George Washington Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crooked-lane-books.jpeg
Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The George Washington Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The George Washington Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press in 2025.

Incident History — The George Washington Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The George Washington Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-george-washington-law-review.jpeg
The George Washington Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crooked-lane-books.jpeg
Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The George Washington Law Review company and Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The George Washington Law Review company.

In the current year, Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company and The George Washington Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company nor The George Washington Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company nor The George Washington Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company nor The George Washington Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The George Washington Law Review company nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The George Washington Law Review nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The George Washington Law Review company nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The George Washington Law Review company employs more people globally than Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The George Washington Law Review nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The George Washington Law Review nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The George Washington Law Review nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The George Washington Law Review nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The George Washington Law Review nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The George Washington Law Review nor Crooked Lane Books / Alcove Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References