Comparison Overview

Tesrex

VS

Coe and Company

Tesrex

27A Church Street, Rickmansworth, WD3 1DE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Tesrex is a technology consulting company & VAR (Value Added Reseller) based in the UK, driving accelerated adoption of new and transformative technologies. We are specialists in Cisco Solutions including Cisco Enterprise Agreements, Collaboration, Security, Networking/DC and Cloud. Tesrex is a Cisco Premier Partner with Advanced Security Specialisation. We also provide solutions from F5 Networks & Palo Alto Networks.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coe and Company

3900 River Road, Jefferson, LA, 70121, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Coe & Company is the only Microsoft Gold Partner in Louisiana that has been awarded both Networking Infrastructure and Accounting Software competencies, the two most vital aspects of every business today. Our experience allows us to identify critical success factors associated with a financial system conversion, address these factors and make sure care is taken to achieve results; A SUCCESSFUL CONVERSION and more importantly, an improved business information system.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tesrex.jpeg
Tesrex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coe-&-company-llc.jpeg
Coe and Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tesrex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coe and Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tesrex in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coe and Company in 2025.

Incident History — Tesrex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tesrex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coe and Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coe and Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tesrex.jpeg
Tesrex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coe-&-company-llc.jpeg
Coe and Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coe and Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tesrex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Coe and Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tesrex company.

In the current year, Coe and Company company and Tesrex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coe and Company company nor Tesrex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coe and Company company nor Tesrex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coe and Company company nor Tesrex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tesrex company nor Coe and Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tesrex nor Coe and Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tesrex company nor Coe and Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tesrex company employs more people globally than Coe and Company company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Tesrex nor Coe and Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tesrex nor Coe and Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tesrex nor Coe and Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tesrex nor Coe and Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tesrex nor Coe and Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tesrex nor Coe and Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.