Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer ExperienceDeutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience
VS
OPPOOPPO
Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience

Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience

Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 140, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, DE, 53113

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.telekom.design/
752/1000Fair

The Deutsche Telekom Design & CX Team develops products, services, devices, apps, and interfaces based on customers’ needs and insights. We strive for the best customer experience to ease people’s life and to make technology human centered. To do so, we have built a sa...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
OPPO

OPPO

China Resources Tower, Shenzhen, 518000, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.oppo.com/en
800/1000Good

Founded in 2004, OPPO is one of the world's leading innovators of smart devices. With operations in over 60 countries and regions, OPPO's more than 290,000 points of sales and 1,900 official service centers share the beauty of technology with users all over the world. T...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:53,397
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience

Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
OPPO

OPPO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPPO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - OPPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience

Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
OPPO

OPPO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
OPP603062425

FAQ

Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience company and OPPO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience and OPPO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience and OPPO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience or OPPO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience or OPPO ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience and OPPO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Design & Customer Experience and OPPO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44541
SUMMARY

Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49141
SUMMARY

WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47345
SUMMARY

Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47344
SUMMARY

When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-46484
SUMMARY

Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8