Comparison Overview

Technology Bridge International

VS

ATON Computing

Technology Bridge International

7325 Roseville Rd, Sacramento, California, 95842, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.raymarinc.com

At TechBridge International, we have built innovation and longevity through small company values with big ideals. There is a distinct depth of knowledge and talent that nearly four decades of experience brings to our business. It brings endurance and adaptability. It inspires consumer confidence and reinforces our commitment to treating every customer like our only customer. We are your trusted managed services provider and source for Ranch Intelligence. Technology Bridge International (a division of Raymar Information Technology, Inc.)

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ATON Computing

55 North Gaston Avenue, Somerville, 08876-2302, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.atoncomputing.com

ATON Computing, Inc. is committed providing comprehensive Information Technology services to public and private sector clients. We have earned the confidence of our client base by providing custom network design and installation, program implementation, cyber security, and training that enhances efficiency, provides protection, and results in a positive return on investment. Our staff of IT engineers is committed to anticipating next generation solutions within a network, on a mobile platform, and in the cloud.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-bridge-international.jpeg
Technology Bridge International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aton-computing.jpeg
ATON Computing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Technology Bridge International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ATON Computing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technology Bridge International in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ATON Computing in 2025.

Incident History — Technology Bridge International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technology Bridge International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ATON Computing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATON Computing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-bridge-international.jpeg
Technology Bridge International
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aton-computing.jpeg
ATON Computing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ATON Computing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technology Bridge International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ATON Computing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Technology Bridge International company.

In the current year, ATON Computing company and Technology Bridge International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ATON Computing company nor Technology Bridge International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ATON Computing company nor Technology Bridge International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ATON Computing company nor Technology Bridge International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Technology Bridge International company nor ATON Computing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Technology Bridge International nor ATON Computing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Technology Bridge International company nor ATON Computing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ATON Computing company employs more people globally than Technology Bridge International company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Technology Bridge International nor ATON Computing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Technology Bridge International nor ATON Computing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Technology Bridge International nor ATON Computing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Technology Bridge International nor ATON Computing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Technology Bridge International nor ATON Computing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Technology Bridge International nor ATON Computing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References