Comparison Overview

SystemsNet

VS

Luxul

SystemsNet

2325 Maryland Rd, Willow Grove, 19090, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.systnet.com

SystemsNet was founded in 1995 with the objective of providing businesses with a reliable source for complete network solutions and professional network services. We maintain a staff of highly qualified network specialists, application developers, systems administrators, and ACT! Certified Consultants that have been trained and certified on products from industry leaders such as Sage Software, Microsoft, Dell, Symantec, Linksys, Barracuda, Swiftpage, Macola, and many more

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Luxul

12884 Frontrunner Blvd, Draper, UT, 84020-5490, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://luxul.com

Luxul is the leading innovator of simple-to-deploy professional grade IP networking solutions made just for custom installation professionals. Designed for use in both residential and commercial environments, the Luxul family offers a complete line of solutions that simplify network design and deployment—resulting in a scalable network that is both powerful and easy to install. With Luxul, installers can deliver the ultimate IP network without the complexity associated with traditional networking gear. All Luxul products include free lifetime support and a three-year limited warranty. Plus, Luxul equipment is available only through authorized distributors of residential and commercial integration products.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/systemsnet.jpeg
SystemsNet
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxul.jpeg
Luxul
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SystemsNet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Luxul
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SystemsNet in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luxul in 2025.

Incident History — SystemsNet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SystemsNet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Luxul (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luxul cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/systemsnet.jpeg
SystemsNet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxul.jpeg
Luxul
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SystemsNet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Luxul company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Luxul company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SystemsNet company.

In the current year, Luxul company and SystemsNet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Luxul company nor SystemsNet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Luxul company nor SystemsNet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Luxul company nor SystemsNet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SystemsNet company nor Luxul company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SystemsNet nor Luxul holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Luxul company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SystemsNet company.

Luxul company employs more people globally than SystemsNet company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither SystemsNet nor Luxul holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SystemsNet nor Luxul holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SystemsNet nor Luxul holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SystemsNet nor Luxul holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SystemsNet nor Luxul holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SystemsNet nor Luxul holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References