Comparison Overview

Sterling Performance, Inc.

VS

Focal Engineering

Sterling Performance, Inc.

54420 Pontiac Trail, Milford, Michigan, 48381, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.SterlingPerformance.Org

Performance Engines, Engine Rebuilding, Engine Development and Dynamometer Services for Marine, Automotive, Powerboats, Offshore Racing, Recreation, and Motor Sports. Complete Laboratory Testing Services -- ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited – Providing the following services: Fuel Systems Testing: Carbon Canister Testing, Component Testing, Fuel Slosh Testing, Pump Durability Testing. Environmental Testing and Simulation: Environmental Testing Chambers, Thermal Shock Testing, Vibration Testing and NVH Testing. Custom Testing: Custom Testing and Custom Test Equipment Building. Test Lab Services: Battery Testing, Engine Dynamometer Testing. Materials Testing: Magnetic Particle Inspection, Tensile Testing, Performance Testing, Reliability Testing, Salt Spray Testing & Corrosion Testing. Leak Detection: Helium Leak Testing, Evaporative Emission Testing / Permeation Testing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Focal Engineering

467 John St, Victoria, V8T 5H1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.focaleng.com

Focal Engineering Incorporated was established in 2015 and headquartered in beautiful Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. We provide engineering consulting services to the building industry, with a focus on energy efficiency, sustainability and energy modelling for both new construction and existing buildings. At Focal Engineering our philosophy is to produce results that benefit our clients, our community and the environment. We collaborate with our clients and colleagues to achieve a project’s goals, with a focus on energy opportunities. By evaluating how design, construction, operation, maintenance and renewal decisions impact the energy performance of a building, we aim to guide the team towards a cost-effective, energy efficient facility. If you’d like to talk about how we can contribute to your next project, please contact us and we would be happy to meet with you.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-performance-inc..jpeg
Sterling Performance, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/focal-engineering.jpeg
Focal Engineering
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sterling Performance, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Focal Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sterling Performance, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Focal Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Sterling Performance, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sterling Performance, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Focal Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Focal Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-performance-inc..jpeg
Sterling Performance, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/focal-engineering.jpeg
Focal Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sterling Performance, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Focal Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Focal Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sterling Performance, Inc. company.

In the current year, Focal Engineering company and Sterling Performance, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Focal Engineering company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Focal Engineering company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Focal Engineering company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. company nor Focal Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Focal Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. company nor Focal Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sterling Performance, Inc. company employs more people globally than Focal Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Focal Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Focal Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Focal Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Focal Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Focal Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Focal Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References