Comparison Overview

Stanislaus County

VS

Government of Alberta

Stanislaus County

3800 Cornucopia Way, Modesto, 95358, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.stancounty.com

Stanislaus County is a county located in the Central Valley of the state of California, between Stockton and Fresno. As the price of housing has increased in the San Francisco Bay Area, many people who work in the southern reaches of the Bay Area have opted for the longer commute and moved to Stanislaus County for the relatively affordable housing. As of the 2010 census, the population was 514,453. The county seat is Modesto.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,607
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Government of Alberta

Public Service Commission, Edmonton, Alberta, CA, T5J 2N2
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alberta.ca

Work with the Alberta government to build a stronger province for current and future generations. We offer diverse and rewarding employment opportunities in an environment that encourages continuous learning and career growth. We are one of the largest employers in Alberta with over 27,000 employees throughout the province. We are an award winning organization that values respect, accountability, integrity, and excellence. Our employees share a common vision of proudly working together to build a stronger province and make a positive and lasting difference in the lives of Albertans. The people of Alberta enjoy a very high quality of life, including the lowest overall taxes in Canada. www.jobs.alberta.ca Please see our comment policy: https://www.alberta.ca/social-media-comment-policy.aspx

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 19,441
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanislaus-county.jpeg
Stanislaus County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-alberta.jpeg
Government of Alberta
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stanislaus County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Government of Alberta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanislaus County in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Government of Alberta in 2025.

Incident History — Stanislaus County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanislaus County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Government of Alberta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Government of Alberta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanislaus-county.jpeg
Stanislaus County
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-alberta.jpeg
Government of Alberta
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Government of Alberta company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stanislaus County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Stanislaus County company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Government of Alberta company has not reported any.

In the current year, Government of Alberta company and Stanislaus County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Stanislaus County company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Government of Alberta company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Government of Alberta company nor Stanislaus County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Government of Alberta company nor Stanislaus County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stanislaus County company nor Government of Alberta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Government of Alberta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Government of Alberta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stanislaus County company.

Government of Alberta company employs more people globally than Stanislaus County company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Government of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Government of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Government of Alberta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Government of Alberta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Government of Alberta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Government of Alberta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References