Comparison Overview

Stanislaus County

VS

Council Careers Victoria

Stanislaus County

3800 Cornucopia Way, Modesto, 95358, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.stancounty.com

Stanislaus County is a county located in the Central Valley of the state of California, between Stockton and Fresno. As the price of housing has increased in the San Francisco Bay Area, many people who work in the southern reaches of the Bay Area have opted for the longer commute and moved to Stanislaus County for the relatively affordable housing. As of the 2010 census, the population was 514,453. The county seat is Modesto.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,607
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Council Careers Victoria

Victoria , Victoria , Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.viccouncils.asn.au/

Victorian local government jobs offer opportunities for people with diverse skills. The sector delivers more than 100 services and employs staff in the areas of health and community care, corporate and business support, engineering, planning and community development, and environment and emergency management. Local government offers you the opportunity to: • work directly with the community • work in any location across the state • be involved in on-going learning and development • negotiate flexible working arrangements • take part in employee health and recreation programs • undertake further study.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,797
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanislaus-county.jpeg
Stanislaus County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-careers-victoria.jpeg
Council Careers Victoria
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stanislaus County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Council Careers Victoria
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanislaus County in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council Careers Victoria in 2025.

Incident History — Stanislaus County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanislaus County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Council Careers Victoria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council Careers Victoria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanislaus-county.jpeg
Stanislaus County
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-careers-victoria.jpeg
Council Careers Victoria
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unintentional Data Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Council Careers Victoria company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stanislaus County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Council Careers Victoria company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Stanislaus County company.

In the current year, Council Careers Victoria company and Stanislaus County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Stanislaus County company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Council Careers Victoria company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Council Careers Victoria company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Stanislaus County company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Council Careers Victoria company nor Stanislaus County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stanislaus County company nor Council Careers Victoria company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Council Careers Victoria holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Council Careers Victoria company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stanislaus County company.

Council Careers Victoria company employs more people globally than Stanislaus County company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Council Careers Victoria holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Council Careers Victoria holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Council Careers Victoria holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Council Careers Victoria holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Council Careers Victoria holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stanislaus County nor Council Careers Victoria holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References