Comparison Overview

Sophomore Media

VS

Life Sciences IP Review

Sophomore Media

800 Richmond St., Toronto, M6J 3N8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

Sophomore Magazine is an online feminist fashion magazine based out of Toronto for twenty-somethings on their way. We publish and elevate voices and faces of different genders, sexualities, ethnicities, abilities, and other intersections of identity. Sophomore originally launched as a 160 page glossy in 2015, and re-launched in January 2016 as a digital magazine at sophomoremag.com. We aim to celebrate female-identified millennial creatives.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Life Sciences IP Review

London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Life Sciences IP Review is the leading online publication for IP professionals in the life sciences. With e-magazines covering the latest IP, regulatory and transactional matters in the fields of life sciences, as well as daily online news updates and weekly and monthly digital reports and virtual events, it’s the most comprehensive news and comment service for life sciences IP professionals across the globe. Get the latest news and guidance on the challenges facing IP specialists in the life sciences, visit our website today: www.lifesciencesipreview.com.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sophomore-media.jpeg
Sophomore Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/life-sciences-ip-review.jpeg
Life Sciences IP Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sophomore Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Life Sciences IP Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sophomore Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life Sciences IP Review in 2025.

Incident History — Sophomore Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sophomore Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Life Sciences IP Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life Sciences IP Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sophomore-media.jpeg
Sophomore Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/life-sciences-ip-review.jpeg
Life Sciences IP Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sophomore Media company and Life Sciences IP Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Life Sciences IP Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sophomore Media company.

In the current year, Life Sciences IP Review company and Sophomore Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Life Sciences IP Review company nor Sophomore Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Life Sciences IP Review company nor Sophomore Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Life Sciences IP Review company nor Sophomore Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sophomore Media company nor Life Sciences IP Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sophomore Media nor Life Sciences IP Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Life Sciences IP Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sophomore Media company.

Both Sophomore Media company and Life Sciences IP Review company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Sophomore Media nor Life Sciences IP Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sophomore Media nor Life Sciences IP Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sophomore Media nor Life Sciences IP Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sophomore Media nor Life Sciences IP Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sophomore Media nor Life Sciences IP Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sophomore Media nor Life Sciences IP Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.