Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Software Systems, Inc.Software Systems, Inc.
VS
Tyler TechnologiesTyler Technologies
Software Systems, Inc.

Software Systems, Inc.

432 S Emerson Ave, Greenwood, 46143, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://softwaresysinc.com
732/1000Moderate

Software Systems, Inc. has been providing data processing solutions for the Indiana education market since 1976.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Tyler Technologies

Tyler Technologies

5101 Tennyson Pkwy, Plano, 75024, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tylertech.com
737/1000Moderate

Tyler Technologies (NYSE: TYL) provides integrated software and technology services to the public sector. Tyler’s end-to-end solutions empower local, state, and federal government entities to operate efficiently and transparently with residents and each other. By connec...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:7,693
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Software Systems, Inc.

Software Systems, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tyler Technologies

Tyler Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Software Systems, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tyler Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Software Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Software Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tyler Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tyler Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Software Systems, Inc.

Software Systems, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SOF546091725
Tyler Technologies

Tyler Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TYL165712222
🔒 Incident : Breach
TYL401072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
TYL919072525

FAQ

Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. company and Tyler Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. and Tyler Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. and Tyler Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Software Systems, Inc. or Tyler Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Software Systems, Inc. or Tyler Technologies ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. and Tyler Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Software Systems, Inc. and Tyler Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44541
SUMMARY

Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49141
SUMMARY

WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47345
SUMMARY

Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47344
SUMMARY

When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-46484
SUMMARY

Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8