Comparison Overview

SkyViewTek

VS

Margalla Communications, Inc.

SkyViewTek

5 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 210, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.SkyViewTek.com

SkyViewTek (SVT), a computer and I.T. firm which offers services to businesses in the Greater Philadelphia area as well as all firms across the United States. SVT’s primary focus is to provide an expanded offering of proactive Managed I.T. Services as well as computer and server maintenance and support for Microsoft and Apple products. We specialize in ensuring your business is I.T. compliant with third party organizations, such as HIPAA and PCI.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Margalla Communications, Inc.

1339 Portola Road, Woodside, CA, 94062, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.margallacomm.com

Margalla Communications is an independent marketing consulting and analysis firm that focuses on critical issues in the server and storage networking markets. Margalla Communications analyzes the technologies, products, vendors, applications, and market trends in the server and storage networking markets by publishing articles, white papers, and industry reports, producing seminars, and providing related strategic and technical marketing consulting services. Margalla Communications’ Margalla Ventures has extensive expertise in raising capital, due diligence, mergers & acquisitions, and venture capital advising.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skyviewtek.jpeg
SkyViewTek
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margalla-communications-inc..jpeg
Margalla Communications, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SkyViewTek
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Margalla Communications, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SkyViewTek in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Margalla Communications, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — SkyViewTek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SkyViewTek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Margalla Communications, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Margalla Communications, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skyviewtek.jpeg
SkyViewTek
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margalla-communications-inc..jpeg
Margalla Communications, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Margalla Communications, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SkyViewTek company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Margalla Communications, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SkyViewTek company.

In the current year, Margalla Communications, Inc. company and SkyViewTek company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Margalla Communications, Inc. company nor SkyViewTek company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Margalla Communications, Inc. company nor SkyViewTek company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Margalla Communications, Inc. company nor SkyViewTek company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SkyViewTek company nor Margalla Communications, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SkyViewTek nor Margalla Communications, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SkyViewTek company nor Margalla Communications, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SkyViewTek company employs more people globally than Margalla Communications, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither SkyViewTek nor Margalla Communications, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SkyViewTek nor Margalla Communications, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SkyViewTek nor Margalla Communications, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SkyViewTek nor Margalla Communications, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SkyViewTek nor Margalla Communications, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SkyViewTek nor Margalla Communications, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References