Comparison Overview

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre

VS

Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre

1 Straits Boulevard, Singapore, 018906, SG
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre (SCCC) collaborates with arts and cultural groups and community partners to promote and develop local Chinese culture. By creating accessible and engaging content, we strive to nurture greater appreciation of our multi-cultural identity and sense of belonging. Opened by our Patron PM Lee Hsien Loong on 19 May 2017, our Centre located in the heart of Singapore encourages everyone to enjoy exhibitions, fairs, performances, seminars, talks, workshops and other cultural activities throughout the year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken

Coehoornsingel 14, Groningen, 9711 BS, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Het idee om het rijke maar bedreigde bezit van historische kerkgebouwen in de provincie Groningen in stand te houden, ontstond in 1969. Niet alleen het behoud van dit monumentale erfgoed, maar ook het wekken van belangstelling voor de rijke geschiedenis van de provincie Groningen en het Groninger landschap waarin de monumentale kerken als beeldbepalende elementen zijn opgenomen, staan voor de stichting centraal. Groninger Kerken heeft zich de afgelopen 50+ jaar in regionaal en nationaal verband ontwikkeld tot een succesvolle en toonaangevende, eigentijdse organisatie op het gebied van restauratie en hergebruik van cultureel en religieus erfgoed.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-chinese-cultural-centre.jpeg
Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-oude-groninger-kerken.jpeg
Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken in 2025.

Incident History — Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-chinese-cultural-centre.jpeg
Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-oude-groninger-kerken.jpeg
Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company.

In the current year, Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company and Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company nor Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre company employs more people globally than Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X