Comparison Overview

Sinai Grand Casino

VS

Fortune Gaming

Sinai Grand Casino

GETEG - Sinai Grand Casino - Naama Bay, Sharm El Sheikh, 46619, EG
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The finest Casino in the Middle East, located in the always sunny seaside resort city of Sharm el Sheikh, in Egypt. We have the largest Texas Hold 'em poker room in the region as well as a myriad of the most popular games in any casino. Live dancing shows, special events, 3 large screens showing the best of todays sports, an Italian restaurant and a fully licensed bar for our guests pleasure.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fortune Gaming

3650 E Valley Rd, Renton, Washington, 98057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TIL Gaming is a small casino management company. We utilize functional insights gained over years of direct casino operations experience at the highest executive levels. Our team of specialists includes management operations, finance, marketing, human resources, and other disciplines. TIL Gaming has a proven record of success influencing all critical areas of casino operations: Table Games Operations Food & Beverage Marketing, Sales & Advertising Finance & Accounting Human Resources Security & Surveillance Facilities and IT

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sinai-grand-casino.jpeg
Sinai Grand Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sinai Grand Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fortune Gaming
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sinai Grand Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortune Gaming in 2025.

Incident History — Sinai Grand Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sinai Grand Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fortune Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortune Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sinai-grand-casino.jpeg
Sinai Grand Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fortune Gaming company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sinai Grand Casino company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fortune Gaming company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sinai Grand Casino company.

In the current year, Fortune Gaming company and Sinai Grand Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Sinai Grand Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Sinai Grand Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Sinai Grand Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino nor Fortune Gaming holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino company nor Fortune Gaming company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sinai Grand Casino company employs more people globally than Fortune Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino nor Fortune Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino nor Fortune Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino nor Fortune Gaming holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino nor Fortune Gaming holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino nor Fortune Gaming holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sinai Grand Casino nor Fortune Gaming holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.