Samsung Electronics Company CyberSecurity Posture

samsung.com
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medical devices, semiconductors and LED solutions. Samsung is also leading in the Internet of Things space through, among others, our Smart Home and Digital Health initiatives. Since being established in 1969, Samsung Electronics has grown into one of the world’s leading technology companies, and become recognized as one of the top 10 global brands. Our network now extends across the world, and Samsung takes great pride in the creativity and diversity of its talented people, who drive our growth. To discover more, please visit our website at www.samsung.com and our official newsroom at news.samsung.com

Samsung Electronics A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Samsung Electronics

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

samsung-electronics

Website:

http://www.samsung.com

Employees number:

161,321

Number of followers:

4,774,224

NAICS:

334

Industry Type:

Computers and Electronics Manufacturing

Homepage:

samsung.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

SAM_2628342

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreSamsung Electronics Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsung-electronics.jpeg
Samsung Electronics Computers and Electronics Manufacturing
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreSamsung Electronics Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsung-electronics.jpeg
Samsung Electronics Computers and Electronics Manufacturing
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Samsung Electronics

Fair
Current Score
758
Baa (Fair)
01000
11 incidents
-7.25 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

DECEMBER 2025
759
NOVEMBER 2025
758
Vulnerability
05 Nov 2025 • Samsung (Hypothetical Breach Scenario - Knox Vulnerability Exploit)
None

A zero-day exploit in **Samsung Knox’s DEFEX module** was discovered, allowing attackers to bypass **Message Guard’s zero-click attack protections**. The vulnerability, chained with a **phishing campaign targeting enterprise admins**, enabled threat actors to **silently exfiltrate corporate data** from Samsung Galaxy devices enrolled in **Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) systems**. The attack leveraged **malicious image files** sent via messaging apps (e.g., WhatsApp, SMS), which Knox failed to isolate due to a logic flaw in its sandboxing mechanism. The breach impacted **12,000 devices** across a multinational corporation, exposing: - **Employee credentials** (stored in Knox-protected containers). - **Unencrypted email caches** containing **client contracts and financial projections**. - **Internal IT policies** and **device update schedules**, aiding further attacks. While no **customer PII** was confirmed stolen, the **reputation damage** was severe after tech media reported the failure of Knox’s ‘government-grade’ claims. The company faced **regulatory scrutiny** for misleading security marketing, and **stock prices dipped 4%** post-disclosure. Samsung issued an emergency patch, but the incident eroded trust in **Android’s enterprise security** among CISOs.

756
critical -2
SAM5932959110525
Incident Details -
Type
Security Myth Debunking Enterprise Mobile Security Overview Proactive Threat Mitigation
Response
Samsung Message Guard (zero-click attack isolation) DEFEX (exploit detection/termination) Knox Asset Intelligence (device visibility) Managed Google Play (app curation) Knox E-FOTA (firmware update control) AI-powered malware defense (Google Play Protect) Granular IT policies (app sideloading prevention) Knox Suite (centralized management) Google Play Protect (daily app scans)
Lessons Learned
Android security is not inherently weaker than closed platforms; layered defenses (e.g., Knox) mitigate risks. Human vulnerabilities (e.g., phishing) are the leading cause of breaches, requiring user training and policy enforcement. Proactive measures (AI malware scanning, zero-click protection) are critical for modern threat landscapes. Update management (Knox E-FOTA) can be centralized and strategic, reducing operational burdens.
Recommendations
Adopt Samsung Knox for enterprise-grade Android security, leveraging hardware/software integration. Implement granular IT controls (e.g., app curation, update scheduling) via Knox Suite. Prioritize user education on phishing/social engineering alongside technical safeguards. Utilize Google Play Protect and Knox Asset Intelligence for real-time threat visibility. Evaluate Knox E-FOTA for predictable, business-aligned firmware updates.
Post Incident Analysis
Misconceptions about Android security (e.g., perceived vulnerability to malware, slow updates). Human error (e.g., phishing susceptibility, lack of patch management). Lack of centralized visibility into device security posture. Deployment of Samsung Knox for hardware/software-layered security. Adoption of AI-driven threat detection (Google Play Protect, DEFEX). Implementation of Knox E-FOTA for controlled firmware updates. Enterprise mobility management (Knox Suite) for policy enforcement.
References
Blog URL Source URL
OCTOBER 2025
758
SEPTEMBER 2025
756
AUGUST 2025
755
JULY 2025
774
Breach
08 Jul 2025 • Samsung
None

A leak revealed details and images of Samsung's upcoming devices, including the Galaxy Z Fold 7, Z Flip 7, and Galaxy Watch series. The leak suggests Samsung is dropping support for the S Pen on the Z Fold 7, which could impact user experience and productivity. Additionally, marketing materials and specs for the Galaxy Watch 8 series were exposed, potentially affecting Samsung's competitive edge and product launch strategy. The leak was shared by a reliable source on Bluesky, highlighting vulnerabilities in Samsung's pre-launch confidentiality.

751
medium -23
SAM945080725
Incident Details -
Type
Data Leak
Motivation
Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information
Impact
Data Compromised: Marketing materials and device specifications Brand Reputation Impact: Potential negative impact due to unauthorized leak
Data Breach
Type Of Data Compromised: Marketing materials, device specifications Sensitivity Of Data: Confidential Data Exfiltration: Yes
References
Blog URL Source URL
JUNE 2025
774
MAY 2025
772
Vulnerability
30 Apr 2025 • Samsung
Critical Path Traversal Vulnerability in Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server (CVE-2025-4632) Exploited for Mirai Botnet Spread

Samsung addressed a **critical path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2025-4632)** in its **MagicINFO 9 Server**, exploited to propagate the **Mirai botnet**. The flaw, stemming from improper pathname limitations, allowed **arbitrary file writes**, enabling attackers to execute malicious commands, download payloads, and conduct reconnaissance. The vulnerability was actively abused in **three confirmed incidents** after a proof-of-concept (PoC) was publicly released on **April 30**. Affected systems included **versions v8 to v9 (21.1050.0)**, with patching complications noted—users upgrading from **v8 to v9 (21.1052.0)** were required to first install an intermediate vulnerable version (21.1050.0) before applying fixes. The exploitation risked **unauthorized system access, lateral movement within networks, and potential botnet integration**, amplifying risks of **distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks** or further malware deployment. While no direct data breaches or financial losses were reported, the vulnerability posed a **significant operational threat**, particularly for enterprises relying on MagicINFO for digital signage and content management.

770
critical -2
SAM4062340111725
Incident Details -
Type
Vulnerability Exploitation Botnet Propagation (Mirai) Unauthorized Arbitrary File Write
Attack Vector
Path Traversal (CVE-2025-4632) Proof-of-Concept Exploitation Command Execution for Payload Downloads
Vulnerability Exploited
CVE-2025-4632 (Improper Pathname Limitation Leading to Arbitrary File Write)
Motivation
Botnet Expansion (Mirai) Reconnaissance Potential Follow-on Attacks
Impact
Samsung MagicINFO Server (Versions v8 to v9 21.1050.0) Potential Unauthorized File Modifications Botnet Infection Reconnaissance Activity Potential Reputation Damage Due to Vulnerability Exploitation
Response
Huntress Researchers SSD Disclosure (PoC Release) Patch Release (Version 21.1052.0) Intermediate Upgrade Requirement (21.1050.0 → 21.1052.0) Software Patches Public Advisory Public Disclosure via The Hacker News Technical Advisory by Huntress
Lessons Learned
Critical importance of timely patching for known vulnerabilities, especially those with public PoCs. Complexity in patch deployment (e.g., intermediate upgrade requirements) can delay remediation and prolong exposure. Monitoring for exploitation attempts post-PoC release is essential to detect early-stage attacks (e.g., reconnaissance).
Recommendations
Immediately apply Samsung's patch for MagicINFO Server (version 21.1052.0) after ensuring the intermediate upgrade (21.1050.0) is in place. Conduct network scans to identify and isolate unpatched MagicINFO servers vulnerable to CVE-2025-4632. Monitor for signs of Mirai botnet activity (e.g., unusual outbound connections, reconnaissance commands). Review and simplify patch deployment processes to avoid multi-step upgrade requirements that may delay remediation. Implement compensating controls (e.g., WAF rules, file integrity monitoring) for systems that cannot be patched immediately.
Investigation Status
Ongoing (Patches Released, Exploitation Observed in Three Incidents)
Customer Advisories
Samsung's patch advisory for MagicINFO Server users.
Initial Access Broker
Entry Point: CVE-2025-4632 (Path Traversal Vulnerability in MagicINFO Server) Reconnaissance Period: Post-April 30, 2025 (Following PoC Release) MagicINFO Servers (Versions v8 to v9 21.1050.0)
Post Incident Analysis
Improper pathname limitation in MagicINFO Server (CVE-2025-4632) enabling arbitrary file write. Delayed patch deployment due to complex upgrade path (intermediate version requirement). Rapid weaponization of vulnerability post-PoC release by threat actors (e.g., Mirai operators). Release of security patches (version 21.1052.0) to address the path traversal flaw. Public disclosure to raise awareness among MagicINFO Server administrators. Collaboration with security researchers (Huntress) to investigate exploitation attempts.
References
Blog URL Source URL
APRIL 2025
772
MARCH 2025
771
Vulnerability
01 Mar 2025 • Samsung
Potential Battery Issues with Galaxy S25 Edge

Samsung's newly anticipated model, the Galaxy S25 Edge, features a battery with a lower capacity compared to its predecessor, Spurred by competition from Apple's rumored high-capacity, super-slim iPhone 17 Air, Samsung might face consumer backlash if its slim design compromises battery life. Despite housing the powerful 8-core Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, the S25 Edge's 3,900 mAh battery could lead to underwhelming battery performance, disadvantaging Samsung in a market where incremental battery life improvements are expected with each new smartphone release.

769
medium -2
SAM333031125
Incident Details -
Type
Product Issue
Impact
Potential consumer backlash
References
Blog URL Source URL
FEBRUARY 2025
771
JANUARY 2025
770
AUGUST 2024
762
Vulnerability
01 Aug 2024 • Samsung
Samsung MagicINFO Vulnerability Exploitation

Companies running Samsung MagicINFO, a platform for managing content on Samsung commercial digital displays, should upgrade to the latest available version of its v9 branch to fix a vulnerability that’s reportedly being exploited by attackers. The vulnerability in question was believed to be CVE-2024-7399, which was fixed in August 2024. However, confusion arose due to inconsistent information from Samsung. The latest hotfix, MagicINFO 9 Server (Hotfix) 21.1052, mitigates the issue. There is no hotfix for MagicINFO v8, so users should switch to v9 and do it in a particular way: first upgrade to v9 21.1050, and then update to v9 (Hotfix) 21.1052. All customers should investigate whether their instances have been compromised.

761
low -1
SAM732051525
Incident Details -
Type
Vulnerability Exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited
CVE-2024-7399
Impact
Systems Affected: Samsung MagicINFO
Response
Upgrade to MagicINFO v9 21.1050 Update to MagicINFO v9 (Hotfix) 21.1052 All customers should investigate whether their instances have been compromised
Recommendations
Upgrade to the latest available version of MagicINFO v9 branch
References
Blog URL Source URL
JUNE 2024
762
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2024 • Samsung
Samsung Patches Zero-Day RCE Vulnerability (CVE-2025-21043) in Android Devices

Samsung patched a critical zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-21043) in its Android devices (Android 13+), exploited in real-world attacks. The flaw, an **out-of-bounds write** in *libimagecodec.quram.so* (a third-party image parsing library by Quramsoft), allowed **remote code execution (RCE)** via malicious images. Exploits were detected in the wild, with Meta/WhatsApp reporting the issue on **August 13**. While Samsung did not confirm if attacks were limited to WhatsApp users, the vulnerability posed risks to any app using the affected library. The flaw enabled attackers to **execute arbitrary code** on targeted devices without user interaction, potentially leading to **spyware deployment, data theft, or device takeover**. Concurrently, Samsung’s *MagicINFO 9 Server* (a CMS used in airports, hospitals, and retail) was targeted via another RCE flaw (CVE-2024-7399), allowing **unauthenticated malware deployment**. Though no direct link was confirmed, the combined risks highlighted systemic exposure in Samsung’s ecosystem. The company urged updates but did not disclose attack scale or victim details. The exploitation aligns with **sophisticated, targeted campaigns**, possibly linked to state-sponsored or mercenary spyware groups (e.g., NSO Group-like actors).

760
critical -2
SAM3132231091225
Incident Details -
Type
Vulnerability Exploitation Zero-Day Attack Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Attack Vector
Malicious Image Files Exploit Chain (CVE-2025-55177 + CVE-2025-43300 for WhatsApp/iOS/macOS)
Vulnerability Exploited
CVE-2025-21043 (Out-of-bounds Write in libimagecodec.quram.so) CVE-2025-7399 (Unauthenticated RCE in Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server) CVE-2025-55177 (WhatsApp Zero-Click) CVE-2025-43300 (Apple Zero-Day)
Motivation
Espionage (Spyware Campaign) Potential Data Theft Unauthorized Access
Impact
Samsung Android Devices (Android 13+) with libimagecodec.quram.so WhatsApp iOS/macOS Clients (via CVE-2025-55177 + CVE-2025-43300) Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server (CVE-2024-7399) Potential Device Compromise Spyware Deployment Malware Distribution Potential Erosion of Trust in Samsung/Meta Security Negative Publicity High (if spyware deployed successfully)
Response
Meta/WhatsApp Security Teams (Reporting) Amnesty International Security Lab (Analysis) Patch Release (SMR Sep-2025 Release 1) WhatsApp Advisory to Reset Devices to Factory Settings Software Updates for Samsung Android Devices WhatsApp/iOS/macOS Patches User Guidance on Device Updates Factory Reset Recommendations Public Advisory by Samsung User Notifications via WhatsApp
Data Breach
Potential (via Spyware Campaign) Potential (if spyware deployed)
Lessons Learned
Criticality of prompt patching for zero-day vulnerabilities in closed-source libraries. Need for cross-platform coordination (e.g., Samsung, Meta, Apple) in addressing exploit chains. Importance of user education on device updates and factory resets during active threats.
Recommendations
Users should immediately update Samsung Android devices to SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 or later. WhatsApp users on iOS/macOS should apply patches for CVE-2025-55177 and CVE-2025-43300. Organizations using Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server should patch CVE-2024-7399 urgently. Monitor for signs of spyware or unauthorized access, especially if targeted by advanced threat actors. Implement defense-in-depth strategies, including behavioral monitoring for zero-click exploits.
Investigation Status
Ongoing (Limited details on threat actors or full scope of exploitation)
Customer Advisories
Update devices immediately. Reset devices to factory settings if potentially compromised (WhatsApp users). Monitor for unusual activity (e.g., spyware indicators).
Stakeholder Advisories
Samsung Mobile Security Advisory WhatsApp User Notifications
Initial Access Broker
Malicious Image Files (CVE-2025-21043) Zero-Click Exploit (CVE-2025-55177 for WhatsApp) Potential (via Spyware Deployment) WhatsApp Users (Targeted Spyware Campaign) Samsung MagicINFO Server Operators
Post Incident Analysis
Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in closed-source library (libimagecodec.quram.so). Lack of input validation for image parsing. Exploit chaining across platforms (WhatsApp + Apple zero-days). Delayed patching of known vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2024-7399 in MagicINFO). Samsung: Patch for CVE-2025-21043 in SMR Sep-2025 Release 1. WhatsApp: Patches for CVE-2025-55177 and user advisories. Apple: Patch for CVE-2025-43300 (details undisclosed). Enhanced collaboration between vendors to address cross-platform exploit chains. Increased transparency in disclosing zero-day exploitation timelines.
References
Blog URL Source URL
NOVEMBER 2023
773
Breach
01 Nov 2023 • Samsung Electronics
Samsung Electronics Data Breach

A data breach at Samsung Electronics resulted in the disclosure of some of its customers' personal information to an unapproved party. A weakness in an unidentified third-party application utilised by the IT behemoth was taken advantage of by threat actors. Names, phone numbers, postal addresses, and email addresses may have been revealed; the company is alerting affected consumers. The identities, phone numbers, birthdates, product registration information, and demographic data of Samsung consumers were all accessible to the threat actors. In addition, the security breach did not reveal credit card or Social Security information.

750
critical -23
SAM1016261123
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Attack Vector
Vulnerability in a third-party application
Impact
Names Phone numbers Postal addresses Email addresses Birthdates Product registration information Demographic data
Response
Communication Strategy: Alerting affected consumers
Data Breach
Personal information Names Phone numbers Postal addresses Email addresses Birthdates Product registration information Demographic data
References
Blog URL Source URL
APRIL 2023
786
Data Leak
01 Apr 2023 • Samsung Electronics
Samsung Data Breach Incident via ChatGPT

Samsung suffered a data breach incident in April 2023 after Samsung employees have shared internal documents, including meeting notes and source code, with the popular chatbot service ChatGPT. The organisation had three data leaks as a result of its staff members disclosing private information using ChatGPT. Samsung Electronics is alerting staff members to the potential dangers of using ChatGPT and emphasising that there is no way to stop the disclosure of the information submitted to OpenAI's chatbot service.

763
high -23
SAM33929523
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Attack Vector
Employee Data Sharing with ChatGPT
Motivation
Unintentional Data Sharing
Impact
internal documents meeting notes source code
Response
Communication Strategy: Alerting staff members to the potential dangers of using ChatGPT
Data Breach
internal documents meeting notes source code
Post Incident Analysis
Root Causes: Employee use of ChatGPT
References
Blog URL Source URL
JULY 2022
798
Breach
01 Jul 2022 • Samsung Electronics
Samsung Data Breach

Samsung suffered a data breach incident in late July 2022 after an unauthorized third party acquired information from some of Samsung’s U.S. systems. The exposed information included the name, contact, location, date of birth, and product registration information of its customers. Samsung worked with an external cybersecurity firm to prevent the attack from escalating and communicated directly with the affected customers.

775
critical -23
SAM203923922
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Impact
name contact location date of birth product registration information
Response
Third Party Assistance: External cybersecurity firm Communication Strategy: Direct communication with affected customers
Data Breach
name contact location date of birth product registration information
References
Blog URL Source URL
MARCH 2022
818
Breach
01 Mar 2022 • Samsung Electronics
Samsung Data Breach by LAPSUS$

The tech giant Samsung was targeted by LAPSUS$ hacking group whto steal almost 200GB of sensitive data in March 2022. The exposed 190GB files included the source code for Samsung’s activation servers, bootloaders and biometric unlock algorithms for all recently released Samsung devices, and trusted applets for Samsung’s TrustZone environment. The hacker also published the data on their telegram group and made it available for users to download it for free.

795
critical -23
SAM211923922
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Attack Vector
Hacking
Motivation
Data Theft Public Disclosure
Impact
Data Compromised: 190GB Activation Servers Bootloaders Biometric Unlock Algorithms TrustZone Environment
Data Breach
Source Code Activation Servers Bootloaders Biometric Unlock Algorithms Trusted Applets Sensitivity Of Data: High Data Exfiltration: Yes
References
Blog URL Source URL
JUNE 2021
840
Breach
16 Jun 2021 • Samsung Electronics Germany
Data Breach at Samsung Electronics Germany

A substantial data breach has hit Samsung Electronics Germany with around 270,000 customer records being sold on the dark web by a criminal hacker under the alias 'GHNA.' The stolen information encompasses names, addresses, emails, order details, and internal communications from Samsung's support system. The breach was consequent to compromised login credentials at IT service provider Spectos, linked to Samsung’s German ticket system. The credentials, originating from a credential theft incident in 2021, remained unchanged for several years, which facilitated the breach.

814
critical -26
SAM010040325
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Attack Vector
Compromised Credentials
Vulnerability Exploited
Stolen Credentials
Motivation
Financial Gain
Impact
names addresses emails order details internal communications Systems Affected: Samsung’s German ticket system
Data Breach
names addresses emails order details internal communications Number Of Records Exposed: 270,000 Data Exfiltration: Yes Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Initial Access Broker
Entry Point: Compromised Credentials Data Sold On Dark Web: Yes
Post Incident Analysis
Root Causes: Compromised login credentials at IT service provider Spectos
References
Blog URL Source URL

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for Samsung Electronics is 758, which corresponds to a Fair rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 758.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 758.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 756.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 755.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 774.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 774.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 770.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for April 2025 was 772.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2025 was 769.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2025 was 771.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for January 2025 was 770.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on Samsung Electronics’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -7.25 points.

You can access Samsung Electronics’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/samsung-electronics.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view Samsung Electronics’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/samsung-electronics.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.