Comparison Overview
Rutgers University
Rutgers University
57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, NJ, US, 08901
Last Update: 08/05/2026
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in thr...
Colorado State University
102 Administration Building, Fort Collins, co, US, 80523-0100
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Colorado State, there’s this energy we all share—this undeniable excitement for what’s next. And it’s a feeling you can only find here. As you choose a college, one of the biggest questions most students have is what to study. At Colorado State, we offer over 250 ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Rutgers University
Colorado State University
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Rutgers University has 9.89% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Colorado State University in 2026.
Incident History - Rutgers University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rutgers University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Colorado State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Colorado State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Rutgers University
Colorado State University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.
WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.
Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.