Comparison Overview

Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential

VS

Fluid Networks

Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential

., Palo Alto, CA, 94301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Remote.It revolutionizes network connectivity by replacing manual network management with Zero Trust. "Legacy networking approaches and technology require ongoing management and maintenance to enable connectivity. Remote.It's Connectivity as Code technology replaces manual network configuration with programmatic developer tools to embed connectivity into any device or service." Ryo Koyama, CEO of Remote.It

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fluid Networks

80 N Wood Road Suite 308, None, Camarillo, California, US, 93010
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Fluid Networks is a unique Managed IT Services Provider built on decades of experience delivering custom technology solutions to Small, Medium, and Enterprise businesses. We specialize in building and managing converged Voice, Video, and Data networks with the goal of helping our customers realize increased productivity and true cost savings. This is done by leveraging powerful Server, LAN and Workstation management tools in concert with maintaining partnerships with leading technology companies to give you access to the products and services most relevant to your business'​ success. Our engineers are constantly pushing the technological envelope to bring our clients the latest solutions to age-old business challenges; Let us share what we know and demonstrate how it will benefit your bottom line.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fluidnetworks.jpeg
Fluid Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fluid Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fluid Networks in 2025.

Incident History — Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fluid Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fluid Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remot3.it.jpeg
Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fluidnetworks.jpeg
Fluid Networks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fluid Networks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fluid Networks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company.

In the current year, Fluid Networks company and Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fluid Networks company nor Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fluid Networks company nor Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fluid Networks company nor Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company nor Fluid Networks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential nor Fluid Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company nor Fluid Networks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fluid Networks company employs more people globally than Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential nor Fluid Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential nor Fluid Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential nor Fluid Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential nor Fluid Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential nor Fluid Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Remote.It - Invisible yet Essential nor Fluid Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.