Comparison Overview

Reason Design Limited

VS

CEY Studios

Reason Design Limited

Studio CA19 Casting House, London, Greater London, SE14 6BN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Formed in 2007, we are an award-winning creative design agency working within social and cultural areas. This includes organisations with an ethical outlook, charities and good causes, the arts, education and social enterprises. Our purpose is to work collaboratively with clients where design can make a difference, rather than just decorate. Together, we create engaging, intelligent ideas that are appropriate, achievable and beautifully crafted. Combining intelligent ideas with a pragmatic approach, across a range disciplines, we help to connect organisations with their audiences.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CEY Studios

23068 W. Moonlight path, Buckeye, 85326, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

CEY Studios is a small graphic design, web and print broker based in Buckeye, Arizona. Because of our size, we enjoy working with small businesses or even entrepreneurs to nurture, grow and transform their ideas into reality. Being small doesn’t leave us short on experience. We offer not only design, web and print but also expertise with signage, exhibitions and direct marketing.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reason-design-limited.jpeg
Reason Design Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cey-studios.jpeg
CEY Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reason Design Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CEY Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reason Design Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEY Studios in 2025.

Incident History — Reason Design Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reason Design Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CEY Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEY Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reason-design-limited.jpeg
Reason Design Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cey-studios.jpeg
CEY Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEY Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reason Design Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CEY Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reason Design Limited company.

In the current year, CEY Studios company and Reason Design Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CEY Studios company nor Reason Design Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CEY Studios company nor Reason Design Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CEY Studios company nor Reason Design Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reason Design Limited company nor CEY Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reason Design Limited nor CEY Studios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reason Design Limited company nor CEY Studios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Reason Design Limited nor CEY Studios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reason Design Limited nor CEY Studios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reason Design Limited nor CEY Studios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reason Design Limited nor CEY Studios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reason Design Limited nor CEY Studios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reason Design Limited nor CEY Studios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X