Comparison Overview

Quiktron

VS

Perimeter 81 Case Studies

Quiktron

21 B Avenue West, Albia, Iowa, 52531, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Since 1992, Quiktron has provided quality cable connectivity solutions to Datacomm and telecommunication industries throughout North America. Known to many for the award winning RapidRun®, a complete audio/video system designed to save time and money while evolving with changing technology, Quiktron's commitment to providing unsurpassed technical service and support has gained the loyalty and favor of customers nationwide. We work exclusively through the industry's leading distributors to provide custom manufacturing of fiber optic and copper cable assemblies, as well as distribution of a wide range of products ranging from simple to complex, standard to custom. Combine all of this with facilities in four convenient locations, and it is easy to see why Quiktron is an industry leader in connectivity solutions. Join the Quiktron "group" on Linkedin for updates on products, trade shows, industry news and promotions. Like us on Facebook, follow us on twitter@quiktron and +1 us on Google+

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Perimeter 81 Case Studies

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Perimeter 81 offers industry-leading network security that makes it easy for any organization to secure on-premise, cloud and hybrid networks. Discover radically simple network security solutions with our our Cloud Firewall as a Service, Business VPN, Secure Web Gateway, businesses can now enable secure secure remote access with SASE and ZTNA technology.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quiktron.jpeg
Quiktron
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perimeter-81-case-studies-.jpeg
Perimeter 81 Case Studies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quiktron
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Perimeter 81 Case Studies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quiktron in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perimeter 81 Case Studies in 2025.

Incident History — Quiktron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quiktron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Perimeter 81 Case Studies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perimeter 81 Case Studies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quiktron.jpeg
Quiktron
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perimeter-81-case-studies-.jpeg
Perimeter 81 Case Studies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Perimeter 81 Case Studies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Quiktron company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Perimeter 81 Case Studies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quiktron company.

In the current year, Perimeter 81 Case Studies company and Quiktron company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Perimeter 81 Case Studies company nor Quiktron company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Perimeter 81 Case Studies company nor Quiktron company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Perimeter 81 Case Studies company nor Quiktron company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quiktron company nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quiktron nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quiktron company nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Quiktron nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quiktron nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quiktron nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quiktron nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quiktron nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quiktron nor Perimeter 81 Case Studies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.